Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28398103›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical biology2017

Endophytic fungi associated with Monarda citriodora, an aromatic and medicinal plant and their biocontrol potential.

Meenu Katoch, Shipra Pull

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Biocontrol and Growth-Promoting Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fungal endophytic community associated with Hevea spp.: diversity, enzymatic activity, and biocontrol potential.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meenu Katocha Microbial Biotechnology Department , Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR) , Jammu , India.
Shipra Pulla Microbial Biotechnology Department , Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine (CSIR) , Jammu , India.
Indian Institute of Integrative Medicine · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe Food and Agriculture Organization has estimated that every year considerable losses of the food crops occur due to plant diseases. Although fungicides are extensively used for management of plant diseases, they are expensive and hazardous to the environment and human health. Alternatively, biological control is the safe way to overcome the effects of plant diseases and to sustain agriculture. Since Monarda citriodora Cerv. ex Lag. (Lamiaceae/Labiatae) is known for its antifungal properties, it was chosen for the study.

objectiveThe isolation of endophytic fungi from M. citriodora and assessing their biocontrol potential. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe isolated endophytes were characterized using ITS-5.8 S rDNA sequencing. Their biocontrol potential was assessed using different antagonistic assays against major plant pathogens.

resultsTwenty-eight endophytes representing 11 genera were isolated, of which, around 82% endophytes showed biocontrol potential against plant pathogens. MC-2 L (Fusarium oxysporum), MC-14 F (F. oxysporum), MC-22 F (F. oxysporum) and MC-25 F (F. redolens) displayed significant antagonistic activity against all the tested pathogens. Interestingly, MC-10 L (Muscodor yucatanensis) completely inhibited the growth of Sclerotinia sp., Colletotrichum capsici, Aspergillus flavus and A. fumigatus in dual culture assay, whereas MC-8 L (A. oryzae) and MC-9 L (Penicillium commune) completely inhibited the growth of the Sclerotinia sp. in fumigation assay.

conclusionsEndophytes MC-2 L, MC-14 F, MC-22 F and MC-25 F could effectively be used to control broad range of phytopathogens, while MC-10 L, MC-8 L and MC-9 L could be used to control specific pathogens. Secondly, endophytes showing varying degrees of antagonism in different assays represented the chemo-diversity not only as promising biocontrol agents but also as a resource of defensive and bioactive metabolites.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsDNA, RibosomalEndophytesFungiMonardaPlant DiseasesAntifungal AgentsDNA, Ribosomalantagonistic activityculture filtrate assaydual culture assayfumigation assayPhytopathogen

Identifiers

PMID28398103
PMCPMC6130496
OpenAlexW2606839269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.