Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28397791›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Adaptation and evolution of deep-sea scale worms (Annelida: Polynoidae): insights from transcriptome comparison with a shallow-water species.

Yanjie Zhang, Jin Sun, Chong Chen, Hiromi K Watanabe, Dong Feng, Yu Zhang, Jill M Y Chiu, Pei-Yuan Qian, Jian-Wen Qiu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Adaptation and evolution of the sea anemoneEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yanjie ZhangDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, P. R. China.
Jin SunDivision of Life Sciences, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, P. R. China.
Chong ChenDepartment of Subsurface Geobiological Analysis and Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, 237-0061, Japan.
Hiromi K WatanabeDepartment of Marine Biodiversity Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, 237-0061, Japan.
Dong FengCAS Key Laboratory of Marginal Sea Geology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510301, P. R. China.
Yu ZhangCollege of Life Sciences and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, P. R. China.
Jill M Y ChiuDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, P. R. China.
Pei-Yuan QianDivision of Life Sciences, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, P. R. China.
Jian-Wen QiuDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, P. R. China.
Hong Kong Baptist University · HKHong Kong University of Science and Technology · HKJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology · JPShenzhen University · CNSouth China Sea Institute Of Oceanology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polynoid scale worms (Polynoidae, Annelida) invaded deep-sea chemosynthesis-based ecosystems approximately 60 million years ago, but little is known about their genetic adaptation to the extreme deep-sea environment. In this study, we reported the first two transcriptomes of deep-sea polynoids (Branchipolynoe pettiboneae, Lepidonotopodium sp.) and compared them with the transcriptome of a shallow-water polynoid (Harmothoe imbricata). We determined codon and amino acid usage, positive selected genes, highly expressed genes and putative duplicated genes. Transcriptome assembly produced 98,806 to 225,709 contigs in the three species. There were more positively charged amino acids (i.e., histidine and arginine) and less negatively charged amino acids (i.e., aspartic acid and glutamic acid) in the deep-sea species. There were 120 genes showing clear evidence of positive selection. Among the 10% most highly expressed genes, there were more hemoglobin genes with high expression levels in both deep-sea species. The duplicated genes related to DNA recombination and metabolism, and gene expression were only enriched in deep-sea species. Deep-sea scale worms adopted two strategies of adaptation to hypoxia in the chemosynthesis-based habitats (i.e., rapid evolution of tetra-domain hemoglobin in Branchipolynoe or high expression of single-domain hemoglobin in Lepidonotopodium sp.).

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionOceans and SeasWaterAdaptation, PhysiologicalAmino AcidsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsAnnelidaBase CompositionCodonGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyGenes, DuplicateHemoglobinsMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhylogenyAmino AcidsCodonHemoglobinsWater

Identifiers

PMID28397791
PMCPMC5387418
OpenAlexW2606791390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.