Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28397530›Full record

ArticleCartilage2018

Comparison of Fixation Techniques of 3D-Woven Poly(ϵ-Caprolactone) Scaffolds for Cartilage Repair in a Weightbearing Porcine Large Animal Model.

James M Friedman, Mackenzie L Sennett, Marcelo B Bonadio, Kerry O Orji, Alexander L Neuwirth, Niobra Keah, James L Carey, Franklin T Moutos, Bradley T Estes, Farshid Guilak and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cartilage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cartilage Tissue Engineering: An Introduction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A collagen/PLA hybrid scaffold supports tendon-derived cell growth for tendon repair and regeneration.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

James M Friedman1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mackenzie L Sennett1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Marcelo B Bonadio3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Kerry O Orji1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexander L Neuwirth1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Niobra Keah1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
James L Carey1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Franklin T Moutos4 Cytex Therapeutics, Durham, NC, USA.
Bradley T Estes4 Cytex Therapeutics, Durham, NC, USA.
Farshid Guilak4 Cytex Therapeutics, Durham, NC, USA.
Henning Madry6 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saarland University Medical Center, Homberg/Saar, Germany.
Robert L Mauck1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
George R Dodge1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McKay Orthopaedic Research Lab, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · USAO Foundation · CHCytex Therapeutics (United States) · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Overall: Resource-based Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders Research (Overall Application)P30AR069619 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LOUIS J SOSLOWSKY · 2016 to 2026
$9.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR069619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective To test different fixation methods of a 3-dimensionally woven poly(ϵ-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffold within chondral defects of a weightbearing large animal model. Methods Full thickness chondral defects were made in the femoral condyles of 15 adult male Yucatan mini-pigs. Two surgical approaches were compared including total arthrotomy (traditional) and a retinaculum-sparing, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach. Following microfracture (MFX), scaffolds were placed without fixation or were fixed with fibrin glue, suture, or subchondral anchor. Experimental endpoints were between 1 and 6 weeks. Micro-computed tomography and histology were used to assess samples. Results The MIS approach was superior as the traditional approach caused medial condyle cartilage wear. One of 13 (7.7%) of scaffolds without fixation, 4 of 11 (36.3%) fibrin scaffolds, 1 of 4 (25%) of sutured scaffolds, and 9 of 9 (100%) of anchor-fixed scaffolds remained in place. Histology demonstrated tissue filling with some overgrowth of PCL scaffolds. Conclusions Of the methods tested, the MIS approach coupled with subchondral anchor fixation provided the best scaffold retention in a mini-pig chondral defect model. This finding has implications for fixation strategies in future animal studies and potential future human use.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAnimalsArthroscopyCaproatesCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesDisease Models, AnimalFibrin Tissue AdhesiveLactonesMaleSwineSwine, MiniatureTissue EngineeringWeight-BearingCaproatescaprolactoneFibrin Tissue AdhesiveLactonesarticular cartilagefixationPCLrepairscaffold

Identifiers

PMID28397530
PMCPMC6139593
OpenAlexW2607080429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.