Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28397379›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2017

B-FAHF-2 plus oral immunotherapy (OIT) is safer and more effective than OIT alone in a murine model of concurrent peanut/tree nut allergy.

K D Srivastava, Y Song, N Yang, C Liu, I E Goldberg, A Nowak-Węgrzyn, H A Sampson, X-M Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Traditional Chinese Medicine for Pediatric Allergic Diseases.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Advances in Food Allergy Treatment.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and Allergic Diseases.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Regional Differences in Food Allergies.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2019
    Review
  19. Next-Generation Approaches for the Treatment of Food Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K D SrivastavaDepartment of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Center for Integrative Medicine for Immunology and Wellness, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Y SongDepartment of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Center for Integrative Medicine for Immunology and Wellness, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
N YangDepartment of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Center for Integrative Medicine for Immunology and Wellness, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
C LiuDepartment of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Center for Integrative Medicine for Immunology and Wellness, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
I E GoldbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Center for Integrative Medicine for Immunology and Wellness, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
A Nowak-WęgrzynDepartment of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Center for Integrative Medicine for Immunology and Wellness, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
H A SampsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Center for Integrative Medicine for Immunology and Wellness, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
X-M LiDepartment of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Center for Integrative Medicine for Immunology and Wellness, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6207-2427
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Effect of Chinese herbal medicine on food allergyR01AT001495 · NCCIH · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI LI, XIU-MIN · 2004 to 2010
$3.0M
Mount Sinai Institutes for Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000069 · NCATS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI SAMPSON, HUGH A · 2012 to 2014
$2.3M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000069NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT001495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcurrent sensitization to peanut (PN) and tree nuts (TN), the most dangerous food allergies, is common. Current oral immunotherapy (OIT) is not fully satisfactory.

objectiveTo determine whether the herbal formula B-FAHF-2 (BF2) ameliorates PN/TN OIT adverse reactions and enhances persistence of a tolerant state.

methodsConcurrently sensitized PN-, walnut- (WN) and cashew (CSH)-allergic mice received 1-day PN/WN/CSH rush OIT plus 3 weeks of maintenance dosing, with or without 3 weeks prior and 3 weeks BF2 co-treatment. Anaphylactic symptom scores, core body temperatures, plasma histamine levels, basophil numbers, antigen-specific IgE, cytokine levels, and IL-4, INF-γ and Foxp3 gene promoter DNA methylation status, and their correlation with final challenge symptom scores were determined.

resultsBF2+OIT-treated mice experienced significantly fewer and less severe adverse reactions than OIT-only-treated mice (P<.01) during the 1-day rush OIT build-up dose phase. Both OIT-only and BF2+OIT mice showed significant desensitization (P<.01 and .001, respectively) at 1 week post-therapy challenge, being greater in BF2+OIT mice. All sham-treated and 91% of OIT-treated mice experienced anaphylaxis whereas only 21% of BF2+OIT-treated mice exhibited reactions during 5-6 weeks of dose escalation single PN and TN challenges. Greater and more persistent protection in BF2+OIT mice was associated with significantly lower plasma histamine and IgE levels, increased IFN-γ/IL-4 and IL-10/IL-4 ratios, DNA remethylation at the IL-4 promoter and demethylation at IFN-γ and Foxp3 promoters. Final challenge symptom scores were inversely correlated with IL-4 DNA methylation levels (P<.0002) and positively correlated with IFN-γ and Foxp3 gene promoter methylation levels (P<.0011) (P<.0165). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Combined BF2/OIT therapy was safer and produced longer post-treatment protection and more tolerance-prone immunological and epigenetic modifications than OIT alone. BF2/OIT may provide an additional OIT option for patients with concurrent PN/TN and other food allergies.

Indexed as

Nut HypersensitivityPeanut HypersensitivityAdministration, OralAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleForkhead Transcription FactorsImmunoglobulin EImmunotherapyInterferon-gammaInterleukin-4MicePlant PreparationsForkhead Transcription FactorsFoxp3 protein, mouseIFNG protein, mouseImmunoglobulin EInterferon-gammaInterleukin-4Plant PreparationsB-FAHF-2Chinese herbal medicinecytokines and epigenetic regulationFood allergiesmurine model of peanut allergies and tree nut allergiesoral immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28397379
PMCPMC5533629
OpenAlexW2606090472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.