Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28397191›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2017

Making decisions about breast reconstruction: A systematic review of patient-reported factors influencing choice.

Kathy Flitcroft, Meagan Brennan, Andrew Spillane

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Women's expectations of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Preoperative Expectations of Women Undergoing Breast Reconstruction Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors associated with the desire to undergo post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in a Mexican breast cancer center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Development and Usability Testing of a Decision Support App for Women Considering Breast Reconstruction Surgery.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The influence of partner involvement in the decision-making process on body image and decision regret among women receiving breast reconstruction.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathy FlitcroftBreast & Surgical Oncology at The Poche Centre, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia. kathy.flitcroft@melanoma.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4945-0857
Meagan BrennanBreast & Surgical Oncology at The Poche Centre, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia.
Andrew SpillaneBreast & Surgical Oncology at The Poche Centre, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany studies have explored women's reasons for choosing or declining a particular type of breast reconstruction (BR) following mastectomy for breast cancer. This systematic review synthesises women's reasons for choosing a range of BR options, including no BR, in different settings and across time.

methodsThirteen databases were systematically searched, with 30 studies (4269 participants), meeting the selection criteria. Information on study aim and time frame, participation rate, design/methods, limitations/bias, reasons and conclusions, as well as participant clinical and demographic information, was reported. An overall quality score was generated for each study. Reasons were grouped into eight domains.

resultsWhile study methodology and results were heterogeneous, all reported reasons were covered by the eight domains: Feeling/looking normal; Feeling/looking good; Being practical; Influence of others; Relationship expectations; Fear; Timing; and Unnecessary. We found a strong consistency in reasons across studies, ranging from 52% of relevant publications citing relationship expectations as a reason for choosing BR, up to 91% citing fear as a reason for delaying or declining BR. Major thematic findings were a lack of adequate information about BR, lack of genuine choice for women and additional access limitations due to health system barriers.

conclusionsUnderstanding women's reasons for wanting or not wanting BR can assist clinicians to help women make choices most aligned with their individual values and needs. Our thematic findings have equity implications and illustrate the need for surgeons to discuss all clinically appropriate BR options with mastectomy patients, even if some options are not available locally.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDecision MakingFemaleHumansMammaplastyMastectomyQuality of LifeBreast cancerBreast reconstructionPatient-reported outcome measuresQuality of lifeReasons

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.