ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2017
The science of stakeholder engagement in research: classification, implementation, and evaluation.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 181 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
181 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Classifying strategies for building community health movements: a guide for implementers.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts: a systematic review.Health research policy and systems · 2023Pooled it
- Development of an evidence‑based, theory‑driven, and culturally appropriate character strengths-based intervention for breast cancer patients, following the Medical Research Council Framework.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Pooled it
- How are health research partnerships assessed? A systematic review of outcomes, impacts, terminology and the use of theories, models and frameworks.Health research policy and systems · 2022Pooled it
- Avoiding unnecessary hospitalisation for patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review of implementation determinants for hospital avoidance programmes.Implementation science : IS · 2020Pooled it
- Stakeholder engagement to inform HIV clinical trials: a systematic review of the evidence.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2018Pooled it
- Development of the Pharm-SAVES educational module for gatekeeper suicide prevention training for community pharmacy staff.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023Trial
- Role of trust and trustworthiness in implementation science studies: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Enhancing mental and physical health of women through engagement and retention (EMPOWER) 3.0 QUERI: study protocol for a cluster-randomized hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness trial.Implementation science : IS · 2026Article
- Codevelopment of a Digital Screening and Intervention Tool to Improve Lifestyle Habits in Children: Focus Group Study With Parents and Clinicians.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2026Article
- Participatory approaches for tailoring implementation strategies in healthcare settings: a scoping review of contemporary literature (2019-2024).Implementation science communications · 2026Review
- Factor selection in configurational comparative analysis - guidance for implementation researchers.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Exploring Stakeholder Involvement in Intervention Implementation Studies: Systematic Evidence Synthesis With an Evidence Gap Map Approach.Evaluation & the health professions · 2026Review
- Can Behavioral Interventions Promote Health Equity in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes? A Narrative Review of Promising Treatments.Current diabetes reports · 2026Review
- Applying a complex systems-informed approach to population health interventions: a methodological case-study example of traffic restriction schemes outside schools.BMC public health · 2026Article
- A Brazilian approach to training stakeholder engagement skills in biotechnology undergraduates through curricular innovation.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Involving Health Care Professionals in the Human-Centered Design of a Digital Platform for Work-Focused Health Care: Lessons From a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Healthcare professionals' experiences of delivering palliative and end-of-life care in ethnically diverse communities: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Effects of a Sequential Community-Based Multi Component HIV Intervention on Sexual Behavior, Drug Use and Syringe Sharing for People Who Inject Drugs on the US-Mexico Border: A Quasi-Experimental Study.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Something old, something borrowed, something new: frameworks to guide cultural adaptations and their documentation in aphasia treatments.Aphasiology · 2026Article
121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this commentary, we discuss the science of stakeholder engagement in research. We propose a classification system with definitions to determine where projects lie on the stakeholder engagement continuum. We discuss the key elements of implementation and evaluation of stakeholder engagement in research posing key questions to consider when doing this work. We commend and critique the work of Hamilton et al. in their multilevel stakeholder engagement in a VA implementation trial of evidence-based quality improvement in women's health primary care. We also discuss the need for more work in this area to enhance the science of stakeholder engagement in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.