Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28397157›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2017

The dynamics of de-adoption: a case study of policy change, de-adoption, and replacement of an evidence-based HIV intervention.

Virginia R McKay, M Margaret Dolcini, Lee D Hoffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. No Easy Answers: Avoiding Potential Pitfalls of De-implementation.American journal of community psychology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Virginia R McKayCenter for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. Virginia.McKay@wustl.edu.
M Margaret DolciniSchool of Social and Behavioral Health Sciences, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Lee D HofferDepartment of Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

GWB MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE RESEARCH TRAININGT32MH019960 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Leopoldo J Cabassa, Byron James Powell · 1995 to 2026
$11.1M
Influences on translation of an evidence-based HIV/STI intervention into practiceR01MH085502 · NIMH · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI DOLCINI, M. MARGARET · 2009 to 2010
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085502NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085502-01NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019960Oregon State University Provost's Distinguished FellowshipOregon State University Ruth E Warnke Graduate Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based intervention (EBI) de-adoption and its influence on public health organizations are largely unexplored within public health implementation research. However, a recent shift in support for HIV prevention EBIs by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention provides an opportunity to explore EBI de-adoption. The current mixed-method study examines EBI de-adoption and the subsequent impact on a community-based organization (CBO) dedicated to HIV prevention. We conducted a case study with a CBO implementing RESPECT, an HIV prevention EBI, over 5 years (2010-2014), but then de-adopted the intervention. We collected archival data documenting RESPECT implementation and conducted two semi-structured interviews with RESPECT staff (N = 5). Using Fixsen and colleagues' implementation framework, we developed a narrative of RESPECT implementation, delivery, and de-adoption and a thematic analysis to understand additional consequences of RESPECT de-adoption. Discontinuation of RESPECT activities unfolded in a process over time, requiring effort by RESPECT staff. RESPECT de-adoption had wide-reaching influences on individual staff, interactions between the staff and the community, the agency overall, and for implementation of future EBIs. We propose a revision of the implementation framework, incorporating EBI de-adoption as a phase of the implementation cycle. Furthermore, EBI de-adoption may have important, unintended consequences and can inform future HIV prevention strategies and guide research focusing on EBI de-adoption.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PolicyAdolescentAdultCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.FemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedProgram DevelopmentUnited StatesYoung AdultComplex adaptive systemDe-adoptionDe-implementationDissemination and implementationEvidence-based interventionHIV prevention

Identifiers

PMID28397157
PMCPMC5684074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.