Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28397113›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2017

Managing Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia: How Far Have We Come?

Joshua T Kantrowitz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New Developments in the Treatment of Schizophrenia: An Expert Roundtable.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  12. Histamine HProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Challenges and Considerations in Treating Negative and Cognitive Symptoms of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The role of lumateperone in the treatment of schizophrenia.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2021
    Review
  20. Targeting Serotonin 5-HTCNS drugs · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joshua T KantrowitzSchizophrenia Research Center, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, NY, 10962, USA. jk3380@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The specific efficacy of antipsychotics on negative symptoms is questionable, suggesting an urgent need for specific treatments for negative symptoms. This review includes studies published since 2014 with a primary or secondary focus on treating negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Special emphasis is given to recently published meta-analyses. Topics include novel pharmacological approaches, including glutamatergic-based and nicotinic-acetylcholinergic treatments, treatments approved for other indications by the US FDA (or other regulatory bodies) (antipsychotics, antidepressants, and mood stabilizers), brain stimulation, and behavioral- and activity-based approaches, including physical exercise. Potential complications regarding the design of current negative symptom trials are discussed and include inconsistent placebo effects, lack of reliable biomarkers, negative symptom scale and inclusion criteria variability, attempts to distinguish between primary and secondary negative symptoms, lack of focus on early psychosis, and the potential iatrogenic bias of clinical trials.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsHumansSchizophreniaAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.