Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28397084›Full record

ReviewHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2017

How to Measure 24-hour Central Blood Pressure and Its Potential Clinical Implications.

Giacomo Pucci, Francesca Battista, Alessandra Crocetti, Giovanni Tilocca, Enrico Boschetti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giacomo PucciDipartimento di Medicina, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy. giacomo.pucci@unipg.it.
Francesca BattistaDipartimento di Medicina, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Alessandra CrocettiDipartimento di Medicina, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Giovanni TiloccaDipartimento di Medicina, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Enrico BoschettiDipartimento di Medicina, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of 24-hour central blood pressure (24h cBP) combines the cBP non-invasive assessment with the 24-h ambulatory BP measurement. The major strength of the 24-h cBP evaluation is the ability to assess the degree of circadian changes between central and peripheral BP, namely 24-h BP amplification. This allows an accurate quantification of the degree of spatial and temporal BP variability in each single individual. BP amplification depends from a number of factors, such as the interaction between pressure and flow pulsatile motions, vasomotor tone, arterial tapering and other physiological and anthropometrical determinants. The assessment of 24-h BP amplification, a relatively pressure-independent parameter, may be helpful in better refining the risk of organ damage and future CV events over traditional measures of office and 24-h brachial BP. Currently, only few devices enable the assessment of 24-h cBP. These devices are based on peripheral (brachial or radial) BP waveform detection, and reconstruction of central BP waveform through mathematical models. The estimation of 24-h cBP imputed from multivariate regression equations was also proposed. Clinical data are still scarce and, although suggesting a possible superiority of 24-h cBP over brachial BP in the association with markers of organ damage, they are limited by methodological and technical aspects. There is urgent need of a standardized methodology and rigorous validation protocols for the 24-h cBP assessment. The field of 24-h cBP measurement still requires significant advancements of scientific knowledge before its introduction into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Blood PressureCircadian RhythmAdultAntihypertensive AgentsBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsAmbulatory blood pressure monitoringBlood pressure amplificationCardiovascular riskCentral blood pressureHypertensionTarget organ damage

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.