SynthesisJournal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban2017
Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy with or without targeted therapy in biliary tract cancer: A meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Medical sciences = Hua zhong ke ji da xue xue bao. Yi xue Ying De wen ban = Huazhong keji daxue xuebao. Yixue Yingdewen ban, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for advanced biliary tract cancers: an umbrella review.BMC cancer · 2023Pooled it
- The Efficacy of Different Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Pooled it
- Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Pooled it
- Precision medicine for advanced biliary tract cancer in China: current status and future perspectives.Frontiers of medicine · 2025Review
- Molecular and Immunological Characterization of Biliary Tract Cancers: A Paradigm Shift Towards a Personalized Medicine.Cancers · 2020Review
- Review
- Targets for therapy in biliary tract cancers: the new horizon of personalized medicine.Chinese clinical oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The systematic treatment based on gemcitabine plus cisplatin is recommended as the current standard chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancers. However, the exact benefits from the recognized regime are still dismal. We thus elicit this study in an attempt to analyze whether targeted therapy coupled with various chemotherapy could produce improvement of survival benefits. The clinical trials were searched electronically from databases till July 2016 published in English and Chinese. Nine hundred and sixty-four patients from 7 trials were identified in our analysis. The overall analysis achieved a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) among the patients treated with targeted drugs plus chemotherapy than chemotherapy alone (OR=1.87; 95% CI: 1.37-2.57; P=0.000), but failed in the overall progression-free survival (PFS) [mean difference (MD)=0.63; 95% CI:-0.45-1.72; P=0.26] and overall survival (OS) (MD=-0.67; 95% CI:-2.54-1.20; P=0.49). In the sub analysis, better ORR was obtained with the addition of EGFR (OR=1.75; 95% CI: 1.20-2.56; P=0.004) and VEGFR (OR=2.5; 95% CI: 1.28-4.87; P=0.007) targeted therapy. Furthermore, the sub analysis of EGFR target showed an significant improvement on PFS (MD=1.36; 95% CI: 0.29-2.43; P=0.01). No significant differences were observed in the incidences of neutropenia (OR=1.37; 95% CI: 0.89-2.12), thrombocytopenia (OR=1.40; 95% CI: 0.83-2.39), anemia (OR=1.21; 95% CI: 0.62-2.38), peripheral neuropathy (OR=1.52; 95% CI: 0.81-2.88), increased AST/ALT (OR=1.40; 95% CI: 0.82-2.39) as well as fatigue (OR=1.65; 95% CI: 0.96-2.84) in either of the treatment groups. In conclusion, better ORR associated with chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy (both targeting EGFR and VEGF) is found in the present meta-analysis without the cost of increased unacceptable toxicities, but regretfully not for the OS. The sub-analysis of targeting EGFR instead of VEGF obtains a superior PFS. Otherwise, there is no statistically significant difference in the overall PFS between the combination regime and chemotherapy alone. Given the paucity of favorable data, we need further studies to characterize optimal targeted agents to confirm the potential value to biliary tract cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28397047What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.