ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2017
Cardiac surgery 2016 reviewed.
Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for pure aortic valve regurgitation: "on-label" versus "off-label" use of TAVR devices.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Pooled it
- Renal function and coronary bypass surgery in patients with ischemic heart failure.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022Trial
- An implementation manual for an interprofessional enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in cardiac surgery following international established frameworks.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Chronic thoracic pain after cardiac surgery: role of inflammation and biomechanical sternal stability.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for sutureless bioprosthetic aortic paravalvular leak in the era of COVID-19.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2021Article
- Cardiac surgery 2018 reviewed.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Review
- Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation (VinV-TAVR) for failed surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2019Article
- Cardiac surgery 2017 reviewed.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018Review
- Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score and EuroSCORE-2 Appropriately Assess 30-Day Postoperative Mortality in the STICH Trial and a Contemporary Cohort of Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Surgical Revascularization.Circulation. Heart failure · 2018Article
- Impact of pannus formation on hemodynamic dysfunction of prosthetic aortic valve: pannus extent and its relationship to prosthetic valve motion and degree of stenosis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018Article
- Control of cardiac chronotropic function in patients after heart transplantation: effects of ivabradine and metoprolol succinate on resting heart rate in the denervated heart.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018Observational
- Assessment and pathophysiology of pain in cardiac surgery.Journal of pain research · 2018Review
- Levosimendan for Perioperative Cardioprotection: Myth or Reality?Current cardiology reviews · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For the year 2016, more than 20,000 published references can be found in Pubmed when entering the search term "cardiac surgery". Publications last year have helped to more clearly delineate the fields where classic surgery and modern interventional techniques overlap. The field of coronary bypass surgery (partially compared to percutaneous coronary intervention) was enriched by five large prospective randomized trials. The value of CABG for complex coronary disease was reconfirmed and for less complex main stem lesions, PCI was found potentially equal. For aortic valve treatment, more evidence was presented for the superiority of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for patients with intermediate risk. However, the 2016 evidence argued against the liberal expansion to the low-risk field, where conventional aortic valve replacement still appears superior. For the mitral valve, many publications emphasized the significant impact of mitral valve reconstruction on survival in structural mitral regurgitation. In addition, there were many relevant and other interesting contributions from the purely operative arena in the fields of coronary revascularization, surgical treatment of valve disease, terminal heart failure (i.e., transplantation and ventricular assist devices), and aortic surgery. While this article attempts to summarize the most pertinent publications it does not have the expectation of being complete and cannot be free of individual interpretation. As in recent years, it provides a condensed summary that is intended to give the reader "solid ground" for up-to-date decision-making in cardiac surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.