Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28396907›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2017

Target bottom-up strength determines the extent of attentional modulations on conscious perception.

Fabiano Botta, Estrella Ródenas, Ana B Chica

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabiano BottaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18011, Granada, Spain. fabianobottaster@gmail.com.
Estrella RódenasDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18011, Granada, Spain.
Ana B ChicaDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18011, Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A sufficient level of alerting, bottom-up stimulus strength, and attention have been proposed as important pre-requisites for conscious perception (Dehaene et al. in Trends Cogn Sci 10:204-211, 2006). The combination of different levels of each of these processes might differentially bias the access to consciousness, so that the impact of a specific factor on conscious access would depend on the levels of the other factors. To explore this possibility, we measured how the interaction between different levels of (phasic and tonic) alerting, stimulus bottom-up activation, and endogenous spatial attention, influences conscious perception. We observed that endogenous spatial attention affected conscious perception mainly when target bottom-up strength was low, by improving perceptual sensitivity and making the response criterion stricter. Attention-driven increases of perceptual sensitivity (without variations in response criterion) were also observed for higher levels of bottom-up strength, but only when tonic alerting decreased. Phasic alerting boosted perceptual sensitivity independently of target bottom-up strength, even though it differently affected response bias, yielding a more liberal response criterion when target bottom-up strength increases. These results suggest that a more exhaustive approach to the study of conscious perception should consider the interaction of the multiple factors that are susceptible to modulate perceptual consciousness, rather than studying their effects in isolation.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAttentionConsciousnessCuesFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeSpace PerceptionYoung AdultAlertingBottom-up strengthConscious perceptionEndogenous attentionSpatial attention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.