ArticleBiomicrofluidics2017
Elucidating the DEP phenomena using a volumetric polarization approach with consideration of the electric double layer.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dielectrophoretic Crossover Frequency of Single Particles: Quantifying the Effect of Surface Functional Groups and Electrohydrodynamic Flow Drag Force.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Optoelectrokinetics-based microfluidic platform for bioapplications: A review of recent advances.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Review
- Elucidating the Mechanisms of Two Unique Phenomena Governed by Particle-Particle Interaction under DEP: Tumbling Motion of Pearl Chains and Alignment of Ellipsoidal Particles.Micromachines · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dielectrophoretic (DEP) phenomena have been explored to great success for various applications like particle sorting and separation. To elucidate the underlying mechanism and quantify the DEP force experienced by particles, the point-dipole and Maxwell Stress Tensor (MST) methods are commonly used. However, both methods exhibit their own limitations. For example, the point-dipole method is unable to fully capture the essence of particle-particle interactions and the MST method is not suitable for particles of non-homogeneous property. Moreover, both methods fare poorly when it comes to explaining DEP phenomena such as the dependence of crossover frequency on medium conductivity. To address these limitations, the authors have developed a new method, termed volumetric-integration method, with the aid of computational implementation, to reexamine the DEP phenomena, elucidate the governing mechanism, and quantify the DEP force. The effect of an electric double layer (EDL) on particles' crossover behavior is dealt with through consideration of the EDL structure along with surface ionic/molecular adsorption, unlike in other methods, where the EDL is accounted for through simply assigning a surface conductance value to the particles. For validation, by comparing with literature experimental data, the authors show that the new method can quantify the DEP force on not only homogeneous particles but also non-homogeneous ones, and predict particle-particle interactions fairly accurately. Moreover, the authors also show that the predicted dependence of crossover frequency on medium conductivity and particle size agrees very well with experimental measurements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.