Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28396690›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology2017

Sputum cell counts to manage prednisone-dependent asthma: effects on FEV

Afia Aziz-Ur-Rehman, Angira Dasgupta, Melanie Kjarsgaard, Frederick E Hargreave, Parameswaran Nair

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inhaled Corticosteroids and Adult Asthma.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Afia Aziz-Ur-Rehman *Department of Medicine, McMaster University and St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada.
Angira Dasgupta *Department of Medicine, McMaster University and St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada.
Melanie KjarsgaardDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University and St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada.
Frederick E HargreaveDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University and St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada.
Parameswaran NairDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University and St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1041-9492
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton · CAInstitute for Respiratory Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrednisone dependence in asthma is usually described based on clinical and spirometric characteristics. It is generally believed that these patients have frequent exacerbations and lose lung function rapidly because of uncontrolled airway eosinophilia.

objectivesThe objectives of this study are to report the effect on asthma exacerbations and the change in lung function over time in prednisone-dependent asthma when severe asthma is managed using a protocol that aims to maintain normal sputum cell counts.

methodsA retrospective survey of patients prospectively assessed in a university tertiary care asthma clinic.

results52 patients (30 males, mean age 51 years, 64% non-atopic) were followed for a median period of 5.4 years (min-max: 0.2-35.2). Monitoring with the aim of keeping sputum eosinophils below 3% resulted in higher doses of corticosteroids (median daily dose of prednisone was 10 mg and for inhaled corticosteroids was 1500 μg of fluticasone equivalent) than at baseline and this was associated with predictable adverse effects. Despite the disease severity, 10 patients (19%) did not require LABA for symptom control. Most importantly, over the period of follow-up, there were only 0.3 eosinophilic exacerbations/patient/year. Overall, there was an increase in FEV1 over the period of follow-up (mean +84.6 ml/year) rather than an expected decline.

conclusionsMonitoring of eosinophils in sputum enables to maintain symptom control and preserve FEV1 in patients with severe prednisone-dependent asthma.

Indexed as

EosinophilsExacerbationsFEV1PrednisoneSevere asthmaSputum cell counts

Identifiers

PMID28396690
PMCPMC5379704
OpenAlexW2604408848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.