Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28396635›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2017

Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats (SHR) Are Resistant to a Reserpine-Induced Progressive Model of Parkinson's Disease: Differences in Motor Behavior, Tyrosine Hydroxylase and α-Synuclein Expression.

Anderson H F F Leão, Ywlliane S R Meurer, Anatildes F da Silva, André M Medeiros, Clarissa L C Campêlo, Vanessa C Abílio, Rovena C G K Engelberth, Jeferson S Cavalcante, Geison S Izídio, Alessandra M Ribeiro and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. ZembrinMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anderson H F F LeãoMemory Studies Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do NorteNatal, Brazil; Brain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do NorteNatal, Brazil; Behavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Federal University of São PauloSão Paulo, Brazil.
Ywlliane S R MeurerMemory Studies Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Anatildes F da SilvaBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
André M MedeirosBehavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Federal University of São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil.
Clarissa L C CampêloMemory Studies Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Vanessa C AbílioDepartment of Pharmacology, Federal University of São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil.
Rovena C G K EngelberthNeurochemical Studies Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Jeferson S CavalcanteNeurochemical Studies Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Geison S IzídioLaboratory of Behavioral Genetics, Department of Cellular Biology, Embryology and Genetics, Federal University of Santa Catarina Florianopolis, Brazil.
Alessandra M RibeiroDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo Santos, Brazil.
Regina H SilvaMemory Studies Laboratory, Department of Physiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do NorteNatal, Brazil; Behavioral Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Federal University of São PauloSão Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reserpine is an irreversible inhibitor of vesicular monoamine transporter-2 (VMAT2) used to study Parkinson's disease (PD) and screening for antiparkinsonian treatments in rodents. Recently, the repeated treatment with a low-dose of reserpine was proposed as a progressive model of PD. Rats under this treatment show progressive catalepsy behavior, oral movements and spontaneous motor activity decrement. In parallel, compared to Wistar rats, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) are resistant to acute reserpine-induced oral dyskinesia. We aimed to assess whether SHR would present differential susceptibility to repeated reserpine-induced deficits in the progressive model of PD. Male Wistar and SHR rats were administered 15 subcutaneously (s.c.) injections of reserpine (0.1 mg/kg) or vehicle, every other day and motor activity was assessed by the catalepsy, oral movements and open field tests. Only reserpine-treated Wistar rats presented increased latency to step down in the catalepsy test and impaired spontaneous activity in the open field. On the other hand, there was an increase in oral movements in both reserpine-treated strains, although with reduced magnitude and latency to instauration in SHR. After a 15-day withdrawn period, both strains recovered from motor impairment, but SHR animals expressed reduced latencies to reach control levels. Finally, we performed immunohistochemistry for tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and α-synuclein (α-syn) 48 h after the last injection or 15 days after withdrawn. Reserpine-treated animals presented a reduction in TH and an increase in α-syn immunoreactivity in the substantia nigra and dorsal striatum (dSTR), which were both recovered after 15 days of withdraw. Furthermore, SHR rats were resistant to reserpine-induced TH decrement in the substantia nigra, and presented reduced immunoreactivity to α-syn in the dSTR relative to Wistar rats, irrespective of treatment. This effect was accompanied by increase of malondaldhyde (MDA) in the striatum of reserpine-treated Wistar rats, while SHR presented reduced MDA in both control and reserpine conditions relative to Wistar strain. In conclusion, the current results show that SHR are resilient to motor and neurochemical impairments induced by the repeated low-dose reserpine protocol. These findings indicate that the neurochemical, molecular and genetic differences in the SHR strain are potential relevant targets to the study of susceptibility to PD.

Indexed as

Parkinson’s diseasereserpineSHRtyrosine hydroxylaseα-synuclein

Identifiers

PMID28396635
PMCPMC5366354
OpenAlexW2600427053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.