Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28396561›Full record

ReviewClinical chemistry2017

Analysis of Biological Interactions by Affinity Chromatography: Clinical and Pharmaceutical Applications.

David S Hage

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Affinity chromatography: A review of trends and developments over the past 50 years.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David S HageDepartment of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE. dhage1@unl.edu.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

CHROMATOGRAPHIC AUTOMATION OF IMMUNOASSAYSR01GM044931 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI HAGE, DAVID S · 1998 to 2014
$2.7M
CHROMATOGRAPHIC STUDIES OF FUNCTIONAL PROTEOMICSR01DK069629 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI HAGE, DAVID S · 2006 to 2017
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK069629NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe interactions between biochemical and chemical agents in the body are important in many clinical processes. Affinity chromatography and high-performance affinity chromatography (HPAC), in which a column contains an immobilized biologically related binding agent, are 2 methods that can be used to study these interactions. CONTENT: This review presents various approaches that can be used in affinity chromatography and HPAC to characterize the strength or rate of a biological interaction, the number and types of sites that are involved in this process, and the interactions between multiple solutes for the same binding agent. A number of applications for these methods are examined, with an emphasis on recent developments and high-performance affinity methods. These applications include the use of these techniques for fundamental studies of biological interactions, high-throughput screening of drugs, work with modified proteins, tools for personalized medicine, and studies of drug-drug competition for a common binding agent. SUMMARY: The wide range of formats and detection methods that can be used with affinity chromatography and HPAC for examining biological interactions makes these tools attractive for various clinical and pharmaceutical applications. Future directions in the development of small-scale columns and the coupling of these methods with other techniques, such as mass spectrometry or other separation methods, should continue to increase the flexibility and ease with which these approaches can be used in work involving clinical or pharmaceutical samples.

Indexed as

Chemistry, ClinicalChromatography, AffinityChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPrecision MedicinePharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID28396561
PMCPMC5523865
OpenAlexW2606389656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.