Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28396481›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2017

Important methodological issues regarding the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to investigate interoceptive processing: a Comment on Pollatos

Michel-Pierre Coll, Tegan Penton, Hannah Hobson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Emotional and Social Dimension of Abstract Concepts Meet with Interoception in Right Anterior Insula.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Interoception: Where do we go from here?Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Non-invasive stimulation of the social brain: the methodological challenges.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Reply to CollPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michel-Pierre CollMRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, University of London, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Tegan PentonMRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, University of London, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Hannah HobsonMRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, University of London, London SE5 8AF, UK hannah.hobson@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7952-475X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

InteroceptionRespiratory RateCerebral CortexHumansTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID28396481
PMCPMC5394648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.