Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28396411›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Mechanosensation is evolutionarily tuned to locomotor mechanics.

Brett R Aiello, Mark W Westneat, Melina E Hale

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
94.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Zoological studies · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Editorial: Mechanobiology: Emerging Tools and Methods.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparative Principles for Next-Generation Neuroscience.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brett R AielloDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
Mark W WestneatDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
Melina E HaleDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; mhale@uchicago.edu.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biomechanics of animal limbs has evolved to meet the functional demands for movement associated with different behaviors and environments. Effective movement relies not only on limb mechanics but also on appropriate mechanosensory feedback. By comparing sensory ability and mechanics within a phylogenetic framework, we show that peripheral mechanosensation has evolved with limb biomechanics, evolutionarily tuning the neuromechanical system to its functional demands. We examined sensory physiology and mechanics of the pectoral fins, forelimb homologs, in the fish family Labridae. Labrid fishes exhibit extraordinary morphological and behavioral diversity and use pectoral fin-based propulsion with fins ranging in shape from high aspect ratio (AR) wing-like fins to low AR paddle-like fins. Phylogenetic character analysis demonstrates that high AR fins evolved independently multiple times in this group. Four pairs of species were examined; each included a plesiomorphic low AR and a high AR species. Within each species pair, the high AR species demonstrated significantly stiffer fin rays in comparison with the low AR species. Afferent sensory nerve activity was recorded during fin ray bending. In all cases, afferents of stiffer fins were more sensitive at lower displacement amplitudes, demonstrating mechanosensory tuning to fin mechanics and a consistent pattern of correlated evolution. We suggest that these data provide a clear example of parallel evolution in a complex neuromechanical system, with a strong link between multiple phenotypic characters: pectoral fin shape, swimming behavior, fin ray stiffness, and mechanosensory sensitivity.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimal FinsAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaExtremitiesFishesLocomotionSpecies SpecificitySwimmingTouch PerceptionevolutionLabridaelocomotionmechanosensationneuromechanics

Identifiers

PMID28396411
PMCPMC5410822
OpenAlexW2607239883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.