Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28394951›Full record

ArticleThe review of diabetic studies : RDS2016

Dietary Patterns and 10-year (2002-2012) Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the ATTICA Cohort Study.

Efi Koloverou, Demosthenes B Panagiotakos, Ekavi N Georgousopoulou, Athanasios Grekas, Aimilia Christou, Michail Chatzigeorgiou, Christina Chrysohoou, Dimitrios Tousoulis, Christodoulos Stefanadis, Christos Pitsavos and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The review of diabetic studies : RDS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Efi KoloverouDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Demosthenes B PanagiotakosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Ekavi N GeorgousopoulouDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Athanasios GrekasDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Aimilia ChristouDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Michail ChatzigeorgiouDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Science and Education, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece.
Christina ChrysohoouFirst Cardiology Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios TousoulisFirst Cardiology Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Greece.
Christodoulos StefanadisFirst Cardiology Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Greece.
Christos PitsavosFirst Cardiology Clinic, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Greece.
ATTICA Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify dietary patterns among apparently healthy individuals and to determine their long-term effect on diabetes incidence.

methodsDuring 2001-2002, a random sample of 3,042 men and women (18-89 years old), living in greater Athens, was randomly selected to participate in the study. During 2011-2012, the 10-year follow-up was performed in 2,583 participants (15% drop-out rate). After excluding participants with diabetes at baseline and those for whom no information on diabetes status was available at follow-up, the working sample consisted of 1,485 participants. Dietary habits were assessed by means of a validated semi-quantitative, food frequency questionnaire. Factor analysis was performed to extract dietary patterns from 18 food groups.

resultsDiabetes diagnosis at follow-up was made in 191 participants, yielding an incidence rate of 12.9%. Six factors (i.e. dietary patterns) were identified that explained 54% of the variation in consumption. After adjusting for major confounders, and stratification by age-group, logistic regression revealed that the most healthful pattern consisted of the consumption of fruits, vegetables, legumes, bread, rusk, and pasta which reduced the 10-year diabetes risk by 40%, among participants aged 45-55 years. The association reached marginal statistical significance (95% CI: 0.34, 1.07), while no significant association was observed for the other age-groups. When the analysis was additionally adjusted for carbohydrate percentage, statistical significance was lost completely, suggesting a possibly mediating effect of this macronutrient.

conclusionsThe results confirm the potentially protective effect of a plant-based dietary pattern in the primary prevention of diabetes, in particular among middle-aged people. Carbohydrate content may be a specific factor in this relationship; other micronutrients found in plant-based food groups may also play a role.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorPatient ComplianceUrban HealthAdultAge FactorsCohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGreeceHumansIncidenceMale

Identifiers

PMID28394951
PMCPMC5734225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.