Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28394693›Full record

ArticlePsychological science2017

Predicting Ideological Prejudice.

Mark J Brandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Local Legislation is Associated With Regional Transgender Attitudes.Personality & social psychology bulletin · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Validation of the subtle and blatant prejudice towards Bolivian immigrants scale in Argentina.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2023
    Article
  10. Educating for inclusion: Diversity education programs can reduce prejudice toward outgroups in Israel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Relation of Personal Characteristics with Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Outcomes: Assessing the Mediating Role of Vaccine Hesitancy Dimensions.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2023
    Article
  14. A Psychology of Ideology: Unpacking the Psychological Structure of Ideological Thinking.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. What Is Central to Political Belief System Networks?Personality & social psychology bulletin · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mark J BrandtDepartment of Social Psychology, Tilburg University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major shortcoming of current models of ideological prejudice is that although they can anticipate the direction of the association between participants' ideology and their prejudice against a range of target groups, they cannot predict the size of this association. I developed and tested models that can make specific size predictions for this association. A quantitative model that used the perceived ideology of the target group as the primary predictor of the ideology-prejudice relationship was developed with a representative sample of Americans ( N = 4,940) and tested against models using the perceived status of and choice to belong to the target group as predictors. In four studies (total N = 2,093), ideology-prejudice associations were estimated, and these observed estimates were compared with the models' predictions. The model that was based only on perceived ideology was the most parsimonious with the smallest errors.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalPoliticsPrejudiceStereotypingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedideologyintergroup dynamicsopen dataopen materialsprejudicepreregisteredstereotyped attitudes

Identifiers

PMID28394693
PMCPMC5466142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.