Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28394030›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2018

The effect of realistic geometries on the susceptibility-weighted MR signal in white matter.

Tianyou Xu, Sean Foxley, Michiel Kleinnijenhuis, Way Cherng Chen, Karla L Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Field Strength-Dependent White Matter RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Multi-modal Monte Carlo MRI simulator of tissue microstructure.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fiber-orientation independent component of RFrontiers in neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tianyou XuOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sean FoxleyOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Michiel KleinnijenhuisOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3036-4326
Way Cherng ChenOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Karla L MillerOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the effect of realistic microstructural geometry on the susceptibility-weighted MR signal in white matter (WM), with application to demyelination.

methodsPrevious work has modeled susceptibility-weighted signals under the assumption that axons are cylindrical. In this study, we explored the implications of this assumption by considering the effect of more realistic geometries. A three-compartment WM model incorporating relevant properties based on the literature was used to predict the MR signal. Myelinated axons were modeled with several cross-sectional geometries of increasing realism: nested circles, warped/elliptical circles, and measured axonal geometries from electron micrographs. Signal simulations from the different microstructural geometries were compared with measured signals from a cuprizone mouse model with varying degrees of demyelination.

resultsSimulation results suggest that axonal geometry affects the MR signal. Predictions with realistic models were significantly different compared with circular models under the same microstructural tissue properties, for simulations with and without diffusion.

conclusionThe geometry of axons affects the MR signal significantly. Literature estimates of myelin susceptibility, which are based on fitting biophysical models to the MR signal, are likely to be biased by the assumed geometry, as will any derived microstructural properties. Magn Reson Med 79:489-500, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsAnimalsAnisotropyAxonsBiophysicsComputer SimulationCuprizoneDemyelinating DiseasesDiffusion Tensor ImagingDisease Models, AnimalFourier AnalysisMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMyelin SheathWhite MatterCuprizoneGRE phase signalmagnetic susceptibility modelingmyelinR2*white matter microstructure

Identifiers

PMID28394030
PMCPMC6585669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.