Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28394000›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2017

Listening to membrane potential: photoacoustic voltage-sensitive dye recording.

Haichong K Zhang, Ping Yan, Jeeun Kang, Diane S Abou, Hanh N D Le, Abhinav K Jha, Daniel L J Thorek, Jin U Kang, Arman Rahmim, Dean F Wong and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Photoacoustic imaging for microcirculation.Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994) · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. NRM 2021 Abstract Booklet.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haichong K ZhangJohns Hopkins University, Department of Computer Science, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Ping YanUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, R. D. Berlin Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling, Farmington, Connecticut, United States.
Jeeun KangJohns Hopkins University, Department of Computer Science, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Diane S AbouJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Hanh N D LeJohns Hopkins University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Abhinav K JhaJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Daniel L J ThorekJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Baltimore, Maryland, United StateseJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Jin U KangJohns Hopkins University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Arman RahmimJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Baltimore, Maryland, United StateseJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Dean F WongJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Baltimore, Maryland, United StatesfJohns Hopkins University, Department of Neuroscience, Baltimore, Maryland, United StatesgJohns Hopkins University, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland, United StateshJohns Hopkins University, Department of Neurology, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Emad M BoctorJohns Hopkins University, Department of Computer Science, Baltimore, Maryland, United StatescJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Baltimore, Maryland, United StatesdJohns Hopkins University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Leslie M LoewUniversity of Connecticut School of Medicine, R. D. Berlin Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling, Farmington, Connecticut, United States.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Baltimore · US

Funding

Potentiometric Dyes and Membrane PermeabilityR01EB001963 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LOEW, LESLIE M · 2003 to 2016
$4.5M
Imaging in vivo neurotransmitter modulation of brain network activity in realtimeR24MH106083 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GJEDDE, ALBERT, RAHMIM, ARMAN · 2014 to 2016
$1.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001963NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH106083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voltage-sensitive dyes (VSDs) are designed to monitor membrane potential by detecting fluorescence changes in response to neuronal or muscle electrical activity. However, fluorescence imaging is limited by depth of penetration and high scattering losses, which leads to low sensitivity in vivo systems for external detection. By contrast, photoacoustic (PA) imaging, an emerging modality, is capable of deep tissue, noninvasive imaging by combining near-infrared light excitation and ultrasound detection. Here, we show that voltage-dependent quenching of dye fluorescence leads to a reciprocal enhancement of PA intensity. We synthesized a near-infrared photoacoustic VSD (PA-VSD), whose PA intensity change is sensitive to membrane potential. In the polarized state, this cyanine-based probe enhances PA intensity while decreasing fluorescence output in a lipid vesicle membrane model. A theoretical model accounts for how the experimental PA intensity change depends on fluorescence and absorbance properties of the dye. These results not only demonstrate PA voltage sensing but also emphasize the interplay of both fluorescence and absorbance properties in the design of optimized PA probes. Together, our results demonstrate PA sensing as a potential new modality for recording and external imaging of electrophysiological and neurochemical events in the brain.

Indexed as

Membrane PotentialsMicroscopy, FluorescenceAcousticsAlgorithmsAnimalsBrainCarbocyaninesCell MembraneFluorescent DyesHumansMembrane LipidsNeuronsPhantoms, ImagingPhotoacoustic TechniquesPhotonsSpectrometry, FluorescenceCarbocyaninescyanine dye 1Fluorescent DyesMembrane LipidsValinomycin

Identifiers

PMID28394000
PMCPMC5385389
OpenAlexW2607220241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.