Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28393922›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2017

Mitochondrial DNA in innate immune responses and inflammatory pathology.

A Phillip West, Gerald S Shadel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 657 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
657citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

657 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Exercise intensity and training alter the innate immune cell type and chromosomal origins of circulating cell-free DNA in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Cellular Mechanisms Enabling Mitochondria Transfer and Transplantation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

597 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A Phillip WestDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, 470 Reynolds Medical Building, TAMU 1114, College Station, Texas 77843, USA.
Gerald S ShadelDepartments of Pathology and Genetics and Yale Center for Research on Aging, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street, BML 371, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.

Funding

Nuclear Control of Mitochondrial Gene ExpressionR01AG047632 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHADEL, GERALD · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) - which is well known for its role in oxidative phosphorylation and maternally inherited mitochondrial diseases - is increasingly recognized as an agonist of the innate immune system that influences antimicrobial responses and inflammatory pathology. On entering the cytoplasm, extracellular space or circulation, mtDNA can engage multiple pattern-recognition receptors in cell-type- and context-dependent manners to trigger pro-inflammatory and type I interferon responses. Here, we review the expanding research field of mtDNA in innate immune responses to highlight new mechanistic insights and discuss the physiological and pathological relevance of this exciting area of mitochondrial biology.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAlarminsAnimalsDNA, MitochondrialHumansInflammationAlarminsDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID28393922
PMCPMC7289178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.