ArticleScientific reports2017
Demonstration of nanoimprinted hyperlens array for high-throughput sub-diffraction imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-Generation Imaging Techniques: Functional and Miniaturized Optical Lenses Based on Metamaterials and Metasurfaces.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Nanoimprint lithography for high-throughput fabrication of metasurfaces.Frontiers of optoelectronics · 2021Review
- Scalable and High-Throughput Top-Down Manufacturing of Optical Metasurfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Metasurfaces-based imaging and applications: from miniaturized optical components to functional imaging platforms.Nanoscale advances · 2020Review
- Generation of highly integrated multiple vivid colours using a three-dimensional broadband perfect absorber.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Realization of broadband negative refraction in visible range using vertically stacked hyperbolic metamaterials.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Recent Advances in Tunable and Reconfigurable Metamaterials.Micromachines · 2018Review
- Demonstration of a Hyperlens-integrated Microscope and Super-resolution Imaging.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum: Demonstration of nanoimprinted hyperlens array for high-throughput sub-diffraction imaging.2017 · Byun, Minsueop [corrected to Byun, Minseop]
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overcoming the resolution limit of conventional optics is regarded as the most important issue in optical imaging science and technology. Although hyperlenses, super-resolution imaging devices based on highly anisotropic dispersion relations that allow the access of high-wavevector components, have recently achieved far-field sub-diffraction imaging in real-time, the previously demonstrated devices have suffered from the extreme difficulties of both the fabrication process and the non-artificial objects placement. This results in restrictions on the practical applications of the hyperlens devices. While implementing large-scale hyperlens arrays in conventional microscopy is desirable to solve such issues, it has not been feasible to fabricate such large-scale hyperlens array with the previously used nanofabrication methods. Here, we suggest a scalable and reliable fabrication process of a large-scale hyperlens device based on direct pattern transfer techniques. We fabricate a 5 cm × 5 cm size hyperlenses array and experimentally demonstrate that it can resolve sub-diffraction features down to 160 nm under 410 nm wavelength visible light. The array-based hyperlens device will provide a simple solution for much more practical far-field and real-time super-resolution imaging which can be widely used in optics, biology, medical science, nanotechnology and other closely related interdisciplinary fields.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.