Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28393591›Full record

ArticleChronic respiratory disease2018

Presentation, management and mortality after a first MI in people with and without asthma: A study using UK MINAP data.

Paulo Pinto, Kieran J Rothnie, Kelvin Lui, Adam Timmis, Liam Smeeth, Jennifer K Quint

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chronic respiratory disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The safety of cardioselective βERJ open research · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Paulo Pinto1 Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kieran J Rothnie1 Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kelvin Lui3 Faculty of Life Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
Adam Timmis4 Barts NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Liam Smeeth1 Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jennifer K Quint1 Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Imperial College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBFaculty (United Kingdom) · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0902135Medical Research Council MR/L01341X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma has been associated with a higher incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), higher prevalence of MI risk factors and higher burden of cardiovascular diseases. However, detailed associations between the presentation and initial management at the time of MI and post-MI outcomes in people with asthma compared to the general population have not been studied. A total of 300,161 people were identified with a first MI over the period 2003-2013 in the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project database, of whom 8922 (3%) had asthma. Logistic regression was used to compare presentation, in-hospital care, in-hospital and 180-day post-discharge all-cause mortality in people with and without asthma adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, diagnosis on arrival and secondary prevention. People with asthma were more likely to have a delay in their MI diagnosis following an STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction; odds ratio (OR) 1.38, confidence interval CI 1.06-1.79) but not an nSTEMI (non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction; OR 1.04, CI 0.92-1.17) compared to people without asthma and a delay in reperfusion (OR 1.19, CI 1.09-1.30) following an STEMI. They were much less likely to be discharged on a beta blocker following an STEMI or nSTEMI (OR 0.24, CI 0.21-0.28 and OR 0.27, CI 0.24-0.30, respectively). There was no difference in in-hospital or 180-day mortality (OR 0.98, CI 0.59-1.62 and OR 0.99, CI 0.72-1.36) following an STEMI or nSTEMI (OR 0.89, CI 0.47-1.68 and OR 1.05, CI 0.85-1.28). Although people with asthma were more likely to have a delay in diagnosis following an STEMI but not an nSTEMI compared to the general population, were more likely to have a delay in reperfusion therapy and were much less likely to receive beta blockers following an STEMI or nSTEMI, there was no difference in the prescriptions of other secondary prevention medications. None of the differences in presentation or management were associated with an increase in all-cause in-hospital or 180-day mortality in people with asthma compared to the general population.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsthmaCase-Control StudiesComorbidityDelayed DiagnosisFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial ReperfusionAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAsthmacardiovascular diseaseepidemiologymortalitymyocardial infarctionquality of care

Identifiers

PMID28393591
PMCPMC5802653
OpenAlexW2605882031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.