Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28393391›Full record

ArticleGenetic epidemiology2017

Inclusion of biological knowledge in a Bayesian shrinkage model for joint estimation of SNP effects.

Miguel Pereira, John R Thompson, Christian X Weichenberger, Duncan C Thomas, Cosetta Minelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miguel PereiraNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
John R ThompsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.
Christian X WeichenbergerCenter for Biomedicine, European Academy of Bolzano/Bozen (EURAC), Bolzano, Italy, Affiliated to the University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Duncan C ThomasBiostatistics Division, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Cosetta MinelliNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

USC/NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER (CORE) SUPPORTP30CA014089 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Fumito Ito · 1985 to 2026
$181.4M
Translational Research Support CoreP30ES007048 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Joseph Leo Wiemels · 1996 to 2026
$46.4M
Statistical Methods for Integrative Genomics in CancerP01CA196569 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI David V Conti · 2016 to 2026
$25.5M
Methods for Pathway Modeling with Application to FolateR01ES019876 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMAS, DUNCAN C. · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA196569NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014089NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007048NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES019876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the aim of improving detection of novel single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genetic association studies, we propose a method of including prior biological information in a Bayesian shrinkage model that jointly estimates SNP effects. We assume that the SNP effects follow a normal distribution centered at zero with variance controlled by a shrinkage hyperparameter. We use biological information to define the amount of shrinkage applied on the SNP effects distribution, so that the effects of SNPs with more biological support are less shrunk toward zero, thus being more likely detected. The performance of the method was tested in a simulation study (1,000 datasets, 500 subjects with ∼200 SNPs in 10 linkage disequilibrium (LD) blocks) using a continuous and a binary outcome. It was further tested in an empirical example on body mass index (continuous) and overweight (binary) in a dataset of 1,829 subjects and 2,614 SNPs from 30 blocks. Biological knowledge was retrieved using the bioinformatics tool Dintor, which queried various databases. The joint Bayesian model with inclusion of prior information outperformed the standard analysis: in the simulation study, the mean ranking of the true LD block was 2.8 for the Bayesian model versus 3.6 for the standard analysis of individual SNPs; in the empirical example, the mean ranking of the six true blocks was 8.5 versus 9.3 in the standard analysis. These results suggest that our method is more powerful than the standard analysis. We expect its performance to improve further as more biological information about SNPs becomes available.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticBayes TheoremBody Mass IndexComputer SimulationGenetic Association StudiesHumansLinkage DisequilibriumModels, StatisticalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRespirationBayesian modelgenetic association studiesprior knowledgeshrinkage

Identifiers

PMID28393391
PMCPMC5397385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.