Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28393278›Full record

ArticleGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2018

Anthracycline-based triplets do not improve the efficacy of platinum-fluoropyrimidine doublets in first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer: real-world data from the AGAMEMON National Cancer Registry.

A Carmona-Bayonas, P Jiménez-Fonseca, A Custodio, M Sánchez Cánovas, R Hernández, C Pericay, I Echavarria, A Lacalle, L Visa, A Rodríguez Palomo and 22 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Prognostic factors in patients treated with second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: results from the randomized prospective phase III FFCD-0307 trial.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A population-based study in synchronousTherapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Optimal duration of first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer: data from the AGAMENON registry.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.

A Carmona-BayonasHematology and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, IMIB, Avenida Marqués de los Vélez, 30008, Murcia, Spain. alberto.carmonabayonas@gmail.com.
P Jiménez-FonsecaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
A CustodioMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
M Sánchez CánovasHematology and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, IMIB, Avenida Marqués de los Vélez, 30008, Murcia, Spain.
R HernándezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain.
C PericayMedical Oncology Department, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí , Sabadell, Spain.
I EchavarriaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
A LacalleMedical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
L VisaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
A Rodríguez PalomoPharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
M MangasMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Galdakao-Usansolo, Spain.
J M CanoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital General de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain.
E BuxoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
F Álvarez-ManceñidoPharmacy Department, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
T GarcíaHematology and Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, IMIB, Avenida Marqués de los Vélez, 30008, Murcia, Spain.
J E LorenzoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain.
M Ferrer-CardonaMedical Oncology Department, Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí , Sabadell, Spain.
A ViudezMedical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
A AzkarateMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Son Espases, Mallorca, Spain.
A RamchandaniMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
D AriasMedical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Orense, Orense, Spain.
F LongoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
C LópezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
R Sánchez BayonaMedical Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
M L LimónMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain.
A Díaz-SerranoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
A Fernández MontesMedical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Orense, Orense, Spain.
P SalaMedical Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
P CerdáMedical Oncology Department, Clínica Tecknon de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
F RiveraMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
J GallegoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain.
AGAMENON study group
Hospital Universitario de Canarias · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ESHospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital Quirón Teknon · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital de Galdakao · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real · ESHospital General Universitario de Elche · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough anthracycline-based triplets are one of the most widely used schedules to treat advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the benefit of including epirubicin in these therapeutic combinations remains unknown. This study aims to evaluate both the efficacy and tolerance of triplets with epirubicin vs. doublets with platinum-fluoropyrimidine in a national AGC registry.

methodsPatients with AGC treated with polychemotherapy without trastuzumab at 28 hospitals in Spain between 2008 and 2016 were included. The effect of anthracycline-based triplets against doublets was evaluated by propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression.

resultA total of 1002 patients were included (doublets, n = 653; anthracycline-based triplets, n = 349). The multivariable Cox PH regression failed to detect significantly increased OS in favor of triplets with anthracyclines: HR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.78-1.05), p = 0.20035. After PSM, the sample contained 325 pairs with similar baseline characteristics. This method was also unable to reveal an increase in OS: 10.5 (95% CI, 9.7-12.3) vs. 9.9 (95% CI, 9.2-11.4) months, HR 0.91 (CI 95%, 0.76-1.083), and (log-rank test, p = 0.226). Response rates (42.1 vs. 33.1%, p = 0.12) and PFS (HR 0.95, CI 95%, 0.80-1.13, log-rank test, p = 0.873) were not significantly higher with epirubicin-based regimens. The triplets were associated with greater grade 3-4 hematological toxicity, and increased hospitalization due to toxicity by 68%. The addition of epirubicin is viable, but 23.7% discontinued treatment because of adverse effects or patient decision.

conclusionAnthracyclines added to platinum-fluoropyrimidine doublets did not improve the response rate or survival outcomes in patients with AGC but entailed greater toxicity.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCisplatinFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsPyrimidinesRegistriesStomach NeoplasmsAnthracyclinesCisplatinPyrimidinesAnthracyclinesEpirubicinGastric cancerStomachTriplets:doublets

Identifiers

PMID28393278
OpenAlexW2604415595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.