ReviewBiochemia medica2017
The role of laboratory testing in detection and classification of chronic kidney disease: national recommendations.
Review in Biochemia medica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging technologies for early risk stratification and precision management of diabetic kidney disease: a multimodal framework integrating digital phenotypes and clinical biomarkers.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Is the urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentration in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus different from that in healthy children?Biochemia medica · 2024Article
- Determination of cystatin C reference interval for children in Croatia.Biochemia medica · 2024Article
- Advances in the use of dried blood spots on filter paper to monitor kidney disease.Childhood kidney diseases · 2024Review
- Review
- Diagnostic challenges of diabetic kidney disease.Biochemia medica · 2023Review
- Antimicrobial Stewardship and Dose Adjustment of Restricted Antimicrobial Drugs in Hospital Setting.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparability and Stability of Serum Creatinine Concentration in Capillary and Venous Blood.British journal of biomedical science · 2023Article
- The positive correlation between brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and aortic diameter in Chinese patients with diabetes.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022Article
- Multiparametric quantitative renal MRI in children and young adults: comparison between healthy individuals and patients with chronic kidney disease.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- AN INFANT WITH IDIOPATHIC HYPERCALCIURIA AND NEPHROLITHIASIS ASSOCIATED WITH CYP24A1 ENZYME POLYMORPHISM: A CASE REPORT.Acta clinica Croatica · 2022Article
- Reference values of urine protein/creatinine ratio in healthy Dalian adults.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2021Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Quantitative Fluorescent Lateral Flow Immunoassay for Cystatin-C, a Renal Dysfunction Biomarker.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Elevated Arterial Stiffness in Chinese Patients With Diabetes Using Machine Learning.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Laboratory testing of extravascular body fluids: National recommendations on behalf of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Part I - Serous fluids.Biochemia medica · 2020Review
- Assessment of the degree of adherence of medical laboratories to KDIGO 2012 guideline for evaluation and management of CKD in Czechia and Slovakia.Biochemia medica · 2019Article
- The first step in creating national Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) guidelines - a questionnaire.Biochemia medica · 2019Article
- Post-analytical laboratory work: national recommendations from the Working Group for Post-analytics on behalf of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.Biochemia medica · 2019Review
- Task Force on CKD - We have Come a Long Way.EJIFCC · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common clinical condition with significant adverse consequences for the patient and it is recognized as a significant public health problem. The role of laboratory medicine in diagnosis and management of CKD is of great importance: the diagnosis and staging are based on estimation of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and assessment of albuminuria (or proteinuria). Therefore, the joint working group of the Croatian society of medical biochemistry and laboratory medicine and Croatian chamber of medical biochemists for laboratory diagnostics in CKD issued this national recommendation regarding laboratory diagnostics of CKD. Key factors for laboratories implementing the national guidelines for the diagnosis and management of CKD are: 1. Ensure good communication between laboratory professionals and clinicians, such as nephrologists or specialists in general/family medicine, 2. Ensure all patients are provided with the same availability of laboratory diagnostics, 3. Ensure creatinine assays are traceable to isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) method and have minimal bias and acceptable imprecision, 4. Select the appropriate GFR estimating formula. Recommended equation is the 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD - EPI) equation, 5. In reporting the key laboratory tests (creatinine, eGFR, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio) use the appropriate reporting units, 6. Provide adequate information on limitations of creatinine measurement. The manuscript has been organized to identify critical points in laboratory tests used in basic laboratory diagnostics of CKD and is based on the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.