Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28392697›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2017

Comparing the ability of cognitive and affective Theory of Mind in adolescent onset schizophrenia.

Dandan Li, Xiaosi Li, Fengqiong Yu, Xingui Chen, Long Zhang, Dan Li, Qiang Wei, Qing Zhang, Chunyan Zhu, Kai Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Systematic Review of the Current Measures of Theory of Mind in Adults with Schizophrenia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dandan LiDepartment of Medical Psychology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Anhui Province.
Xiaosi LiMental Health Center of Anhui Province.
Fengqiong YuDepartment of Medical Psychology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Anhui Province.
Xingui ChenCollaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Anhui Province; Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Long ZhangCollaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Anhui Province; Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Dan LiCollaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Anhui Province; Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Qiang WeiCollaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Anhui Province; Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Qing ZhangDepartment of Medical Psychology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Anhui Province.
Chunyan ZhuDepartment of Medical Psychology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Anhui Province.
Kai WangDepartment of Medical Psychology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei; Collaborative Innovation Centre of Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Mental Health, Anhui Province; Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence in the literature suggests that there is an impairment of social cognition in schizophrenia. Theory of Mind (ToM) is defined as one's ability to understand others' wishes, beliefs, intentions, and other psychological states and thereby to judge others' behavior, as an essential component of social cognition. However, there have been limited studies on social cognition, especially ToM in adolescent onset schizophrenia (AOS). The current study aims to investigate ToM abilities in adolescent schizophrenia according to various ToM subcomponents (cognitive ToM and affective ToM) and various ToM orders (first order and second order).

methodsThis study examines ToM in 35 adolescent schizophrenic patients and 35 healthy adolescents using the "Yoni task" and "Faux Pas Recognition test" to assess their affective and cognitive ToM abilities.

resultsIn the Yoni task, patients with AOS showed differences in ToM abilities either on a different order or under different conditions. The Faux Pas Recognition task results revealed that AOS patients were not always able to recognize a faux pas or understand complicated emotions under the faux pas scenario. Furthermore, as indicated by the correlation analysis, neither cognitive ToM nor affective ToM was related to the patients' symptoms, disease duration, dose of medication, or intelligence quotient (IQ).

conclusionOur findings showed AOS impairment in the performance of ToM tasks. It seemed that impairment in second-order-ToM is more serious. Moreover, these deficits are largely independent of symptom clusters, disease duration, dose of medication, and IQ. It can be speculated that ToM dysfunction may be a hallmark of adolescent schizophrenia.

Indexed as

cognitive/affective Theory of mindFaux Pas Recognition taskYoni task

Identifiers

PMID28392697
PMCPMC5376184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.