Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28392671›Full record

ArticleIJCAI : proceedings of the conference2016

Baseline Regularization for Computational Drug Repositioning with Longitudinal Observational Data.

Zhaobin Kuang, James Thomson, Michael Caldwell, Peggy Peissig, Ron Stewart, David Page

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IJCAI : proceedings of the conference, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adverse Drug Reaction Discovery from Electronic Health Records with Deep Neural Networks.Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Temporal Poisson Square Root Graphical Models.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2018
    Article
  5. Pharmacovigilance via Baseline Regularization with Large-Scale Longitudinal Observational Data.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhaobin KuangUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.
James ThomsonMorgridge Institute for Research.
Michael CaldwellMarshfield Clinic.
Peggy PeissigMarshfield Clinic.
Ron StewartMorgridge Institute for Research.
David PageUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison.

Funding

TrainingU54AI117924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CRAVEN, MARK W. · 2014 to 2018
$11.3M
Machine Learning for Identifying Adverse Drug EventsR01GM097618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CALDWELL, MICHAEL DEFOIX, HANSEN, RICHARD A. · 2011 to 2018
$3.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI117924NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational Drug Repositioning (CDR) is the knowledge discovery process of finding new indications for existing drugs leveraging heterogeneous drug-related data. Longitudinal observational data such as Electronic Health Records (EHRs) have become an emerging data source for CDR. To address the high-dimensional, irregular, subject and time-heterogeneous nature of EHRs, we propose Baseline Regularization (BR) and a variant that extend the one-way fixed effect model, which is a standard approach to analyze small-scale longitudinal data. For evaluation, we use the proposed methods to search for drugs that can lower Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) level in the Marshfield Clinic EHR. Experimental results suggest that the proposed methods are capable of rediscovering drugs that can lower FBG level as well as identifying some potential blood sugar lowering drugs in the literature.

Identifiers

PMID28392671
PMCPMC5382966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.