Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28392557›Full record

ReviewImmunology and cell biology2017

In vitro tracking and intracellular protein distribution in immunology.

Kajal Zibaei, Sarah M Russell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunology and cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kajal ZibaeiCentre for Micro-Photonics, Faculty of Science, Engineering &Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah M RussellCentre for Micro-Photonics, Faculty of Science, Engineering &Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New imaging techniques have enabled major advances in understanding how immune reactions are initiated, coordinated and controlled. Imaging methods, which were previously mostly descriptive and supplementary to more quantitative approaches, have now reached sufficient precision and throughput that they are becoming integral to almost all aspects of immunology research. Imaging methodologies that increase the resolution and sensitivity of detection, alongside an ever-expanding range of fluorescent reporters of molecular and cellular activity, and vastly improved analysis methods, have all facilitated this transformation. In this review, we will discuss how advances in imaging are changing the way we view immune activation and control using T cells as the model immune system. We will describe how imaging has transformed our knowledge of molecular and signalling events in T-cell activation, and the impact of these molecular events on the behaviour of T cells.

Indexed as

Immunologic TechniquesMolecular ImagingProtein TransportAnimalsCell TrackingHumansIntracellular SpaceIn Vitro TechniquesMicroscopy, FluorescenceSignal TransductionTime-Lapse Imaging

Identifiers

PMID28392557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.