Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28392491›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Intrinsic functional connectivity of the central nucleus of the amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis.

Adam X Gorka, Salvatore Torrisi, Alexander J Shackman, Christian Grillon, Monique Ernst

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00047853 (fMRI Investigation of Explicit Cue and Contextual Fear), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00047853 nacompletednot on this map

fMRI Investigation of Explicit Cue and Contextual Fear

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Ran2002 to 2022Enrolled1,080ConditionsAnxiety Disorders, FearArmsShock device, Acoustic startle
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam X GorkaSection on the Neurobiology of Fear & Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA. Electronic address: axgorka@gmail.com.
Salvatore TorrisiSection on the Neurobiology of Fear & Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.
Alexander J ShackmanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience and Cognitive Science Program, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA.
Christian GrillonSection on the Neurobiology of Fear & Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.
Monique ErnstSection on the Neurobiology of Fear & Anxiety, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.
National Institute of Mental Health · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

The Psychophysiology Of Fear And AnxietyZIAMH002798 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI GRILLON, CHRISTIAN · 2009 to 2022
$29.0M
Prospective Determination of Neurobehavioral Risk for the Development of Emotion DisordersR01MH107444 · NIMH · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SHACKMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
The Role of Anxiety-Related Brain Circuits in Tobacco Dependence and WithdrawalR21DA040717 · NIDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI SHACKMAN, ALEXANDER JOSEPH · 2016 to 2017
$418k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002798NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA040717NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), two nuclei within the central extended amygdala, function as critical relays within the distributed neural networks that coordinate sensory, emotional, and cognitive responses to threat. These structures have overlapping anatomical projections to downstream targets that initiate defensive responses. Despite these commonalities, researchers have also proposed a functional dissociation between the CeA and BNST, with the CeA promoting responses to discrete stimuli and the BNST promoting responses to diffuse threat. Intrinsic functional connectivity (iFC) provides a means to investigate the functional architecture of the brain, unbiased by task demands. Using ultra-high field neuroimaging (7-Tesla fMRI), which provides increased spatial resolution, this study compared the iFC networks of the CeA and BNST in 27 healthy individuals. Both structures were coupled with areas of the medial prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, thalamus, and periaqueductal gray matter. Compared to the BNST, the bilateral CeA was more strongly coupled with the insula and regions that support sensory processing, including thalamus and fusiform gyrus. In contrast, the bilateral BNST was more strongly coupled with regions involved in cognitive and motivational processes, including the dorsal paracingulate gyrus, posterior cingulate cortex, and striatum. Collectively, these findings suggest that responses to sensory stimulation are preferentially coordinated by the CeA and cognitive and motivational responses are preferentially coordinated by the BNST.

Indexed as

Central Amygdaloid NucleusConnectomeFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetSeptal NucleiYoung Adult7-Tesla fMRIBed nucleus of the stria terminalis BNSTCentral nucleus of the amygdalaIntrinsic functional connectivityResting state networks

Identifiers

PMID28392491
PMCPMC5630489
OpenAlexW2605174309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.