Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28392490›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2018

Robust automated constellation-based landmark detection in human brain imaging.

Ali Ghayoor, Jatin G Vaidya, Hans J Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Trends in oncologic hybrid imaging.European journal of hybrid imaging · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ali GhayoorDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1402 Seamans Center for the Engineering Arts and Science, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52240, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Jatin G VaidyaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Hans J JohnsonDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 1402 Seamans Center for the Engineering Arts and Science, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52240, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. Electronic address: hans-johnson@uiowa.edu.

Funding

NEUROBIOLOGICAL PREDICTORS OF HUNTINGTON'S DISEASER01NS040068 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI PAULSEN, JANE S · 2001 to 2013
$48.5M
Washington University ConsoritumU54EB005149 · NIBIB · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MACLEOD, ROB · 2004 to 2013
$39.3M
Neurodegenerative and Neurodevelopmental Subcortical Shape DiffeomorphometryR01EB020062 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, MICHAEL I, MOSTOFSKY, STEWART H · 2016 to 2019
$2.8M
BRAINS Morphology and Image AnalysisR01NS050568 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MAGNOTTA, VINCENT A · 2007 to 2009
$1.0M
Characterization of White Matter in Huntington's Disease Using Diffusion MRIU01NS083223 · NINDS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WESTIN, CARL-FREDRIK · 2014 to 2015
$869k
Enterprise Storage In A Collaborative Neuroimaging EnvironmentS10RR023392 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI JOHNSON, HANS JOSEPH · 2007 to 2007
$405k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR023392NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020062NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB005149NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040068NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050568NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS083223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A robust fully automated algorithm for identifying an arbitrary number of landmark points in the human brain is described and validated. The proposed method combines statistical shape models with trained brain morphometric measures to estimate midbrain landmark positions reliably and accurately. Gross morphometric constraints provided by automatically identified eye centers and the center of the head mass are shown to provide robust initialization in the presence of large rotations in the initial head orientation. Detection of primary midbrain landmarks are used as the foundation from which extended detection of an arbitrary set of secondary landmarks in different brain regions by applying a linear model estimation and principle component analysis. This estimation model sequentially uses the knowledge of each additional detected landmark as an improved foundation for improved prediction of the next landmark location. The accuracy and robustness of the presented method was evaluated by comparing the automatically generated results to two manual raters on 30 identified landmark points extracted from each of 30 T1-weighted magnetic resonance images. For the landmarks with unambiguous anatomical definitions, the average discrepancy between the algorithm results and each human observer differed by less than 1 mm from the average inter-observer variability when the algorithm was evaluated on imaging data collected from the same site as the model building data. Similar results were obtained when the same model was applied to a set of heterogeneous image volumes from seven different collection sites representing 3 scanner manufacturers. This method is reliable for general application in large-scale multi-site studies that consist of a variety of imaging data with different orientations, spacings, origins, and field strengths.

Indexed as

AdultBrainHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, StatisticalNeuroimagingPattern Recognition, AutomatedPrincipal Component AnalysisAutomated landmark detectionMorphometric measuresPrinciple component analysisStatistical shape models

Identifiers

PMID28392490
PMCPMC5630513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.