ReviewNeuroImage2018
Robust automated constellation-based landmark detection in human brain imaging.
Review in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic coarse-to-fine AC-PC localization on CT using registration-guided 3D-UNets.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Machine learning with multiple modalities of brain magnetic resonance imaging data to identify the presence of bipolar disorder.Journal of affective disorders · 2025Article
- Bridging Huntington's disease research with big data science: Harmonized neuroimaging datasets from multiple studies.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Cerebellar morphological differences and associations with extrinsic factors in bipolar disorder type I.Journal of affective disorders · 2023Article
- Posterior Fossa Sub-Arachnoid Cysts Observed in Patients with Bipolar Disorder: a Retrospective Cohort Study.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2023Article
- A new approach to symmetric registration of longitudinal structural MRI of the human brain.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2022Article
- Night blood pressure variability, brain atrophy, and cognitive decline.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Sarcopenia is associated with decreased gray matter volume in the parietal lobe: a longitudinal cohort study.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Genetic load determines atrophy in hand cortico-striatal pathways in presymptomatic Huntington's disease.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
- Trends in oncologic hybrid imaging.European journal of hybrid imaging · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A robust fully automated algorithm for identifying an arbitrary number of landmark points in the human brain is described and validated. The proposed method combines statistical shape models with trained brain morphometric measures to estimate midbrain landmark positions reliably and accurately. Gross morphometric constraints provided by automatically identified eye centers and the center of the head mass are shown to provide robust initialization in the presence of large rotations in the initial head orientation. Detection of primary midbrain landmarks are used as the foundation from which extended detection of an arbitrary set of secondary landmarks in different brain regions by applying a linear model estimation and principle component analysis. This estimation model sequentially uses the knowledge of each additional detected landmark as an improved foundation for improved prediction of the next landmark location. The accuracy and robustness of the presented method was evaluated by comparing the automatically generated results to two manual raters on 30 identified landmark points extracted from each of 30 T1-weighted magnetic resonance images. For the landmarks with unambiguous anatomical definitions, the average discrepancy between the algorithm results and each human observer differed by less than 1 mm from the average inter-observer variability when the algorithm was evaluated on imaging data collected from the same site as the model building data. Similar results were obtained when the same model was applied to a set of heterogeneous image volumes from seven different collection sites representing 3 scanner manufacturers. This method is reliable for general application in large-scale multi-site studies that consist of a variety of imaging data with different orientations, spacings, origins, and field strengths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.