Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28392480›Full record

ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2017

Network Analysis Reveals A Signaling Regulatory Loop in the PIK3CA-mutated Breast Cancer Predicting Survival Outcome.

Shauna R McGee, Chabane Tibiche, Mark Trifiro, Edwin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Good, the Bad and the Tick.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shauna R McGeeNational Research Council Canada, Montreal, QC H4P 2R2, Canada; Department of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B2, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Chabane TibicheNational Research Council Canada, Montreal, QC H4P 2R2, Canada.
Mark TrifiroNational Research Council Canada, Montreal, QC H4P 2R2, Canada; Department of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B2, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research of the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Edwin WangNational Research Council Canada, Montreal, QC H4P 2R2, Canada; Department of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B2, Canada; Center for Bioinformatics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3G 0B1, Canada; Center for Health Genomics and Informatics, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology/Medical Genetics/Oncology, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Research Institute, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada; O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada. Electronic address: edwin.wang@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutated genes are rarely common even in the same pathological type between cancer patients and as such, it has been very challenging to interpret genome sequencing data and difficult to predict clinical outcomes. PIK3CA is one of a few genes whose mutations are relatively popular in tumors. For example, more than 46.6% of luminal-A breast cancer samples have PIK3CA mutated, whereas only 35.5% of all breast cancer samples contain PIK3CA mutations. To understand the function of PIK3CA mutations in luminal A breast cancer, we applied our recently-proposed Cancer Hallmark Network Framework to investigate the network motifs in the PIK3CA-mutated luminal A tumors. We found that more than 70% of the PIK3CA-mutated luminal A tumors contain a positive regulatory loop where a master regulator (PDGF-D), a second regulator (FLT1) and an output node (SHC1) work together. Importantly, we found the luminal A breast cancer patients harboring the PIK3CA mutation and this positive regulatory loop in their tumors have significantly longer survival than those harboring PIK3CA mutation only in their tumors. These findings suggest that the underlying molecular mechanism of PIK3CA mutations in luminal A patients can participate in a positive regulatory loop, and furthermore the positive regulatory loop (PDGF-D/FLT1/SHC1) has a predictive power for the survival of the PIK3CA-mutated luminal A patients.

Indexed as

MutationSignal TransductionBreast NeoplasmsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisSequence Analysis, DNAClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanBreast cancerGenome sequencingNetwork analysisNetwork motifPIK3CA mutationSurvival

Identifiers

PMID28392480
PMCPMC5414713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.