ReviewGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2017
Circulating Tumor DNA as Biomarkers for Cancer Detection.
Review in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
113 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association of Circulating Tumor DNA With Disease-Free Survival in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2020Pooled it
- Utility of the methylated SEPT9 test for the early detection of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2020Pooled it
- Liquid biopsy prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis, cancer recurrence, and patient survival in breast cancer: A meta-analysis.Medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Update on the types and usage of liquid biopsies in the clinical setting: a systematic review.BMC cancer · 2018Pooled it
- Circulating tumor DNA dynamics predict pathological response and guide therapy personalization in the neoadjuvant setting.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Microneedle-Enabled Exosome Therapy: From Tumor Targeting to Precision Treatment of Complex Diseases.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Biomarkers as Drivers of Innovation in Modern Diagnostics and Therapeutics.Current drug targets · 2026Review
- Aptamers-based wearable electrochemical sensors for continuous monitoring of biomarkers in vivo.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Review
- Non-invasive colorectal cancer screening methods: focusing on diagnostic genetic and epigenetic markers.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- The technology landscape for detection of DNA methylation in cancer liquid biopsies.Epigenetics · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy - a narrative review with an update on current US governmental clinical trials targeting immunotherapy.Future science OA · 2025Review
- Emerging biomarkers for early cancer detection and diagnosis: challenges, innovations, and clinical perspectives.European journal of medical research · 2025Review
- Review
- Site-Specific Mutations on KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF Corelate With the Frequency of ctDNA in Colorectal Cancer.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- The impact of liquid biopsy in breast cancer: Redefining the landscape of non-invasive precision oncology.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Recurrence-Free Survival in Composite Hemangioendothelioma: A Case Study and Updated Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Cell2Read: an automated workflow to generate sequencing-ready DNA libraries from human cell suspensions.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Microrobotic Swarms for Cancer Therapy.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Duodenal Fluid Analysis as a Rewarding Approach to Detect Low-Abundance Mutations in Biliopancreatic Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- A panel sequencing dataset of peripheral blood gene variations in pan-cancer.Scientific data · 2024Article
53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection of circulating tumor DNAs (ctDNAs) in cancer patients is an important component of cancer precision medicine ctDNAs. Compared to the traditional physical and biochemical methods, blood-based ctDNA detection offers a non-invasive and easily accessible way for cancer diagnosis, prognostic determination, and guidance for treatment. While studies on this topic are currently underway, clinical translation of ctDNA detection in various types of cancers has been attracting much attention, due to the great potential of ctDNA as blood-based biomarkers for early diagnosis and treatment of cancers. ctDNAs are detected and tracked primarily based on tumor-related genetic and epigenetic alterations. In this article, we reviewed the available studies on ctDNA detection and described the representative methods. We also discussed the current understanding of ctDNAs in cancer patients and their availability as potential biomarkers for clinical purposes. Considering the progress made and challenges involved in accurate detection of specific cell-free nucleic acids, ctDNAs hold promise to serve as biomarkers for cancer patients, and further validation is needed prior to their broad clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.