ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2017
Evaluating the influence of mechanical stress on anticancer treatments through a multiphase porous media model.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interfacial Stress Regulates Plasticity and Drug Resistance at the Breast Cancer-Host Interface.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Mechanosensitive nuclear uptake of chemotherapy.Science advances · 2024Article
- Toward innovative approaches for exploring the mechanically regulated tumor-immune microenvironment.APL bioengineering · 2024Review
- Article
- A continuum mechanical framework for modeling tumor growth and treatment in two- and three-phase systems.Archive of applied mechanics = Ingenieur-Archiv · 2022Article
- Mathematical characterization of population dynamics in breast cancer cells treated with doxorubicin.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Article
- Drug delivery: Experiments, mathematical modelling and machine learning.Computers in biology and medicine · 2020Article
- Investigating the Physical Effects in Bacterial Therapies for Avascular Tumors.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Extension of a multiphase tumour growth model to study nanoparticle delivery to solid tumours.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
- Feeling Stress: The Mechanics of Cancer Progression and Aggression.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drug resistance is one of the leading causes of poor therapy outcomes in cancer. As several chemotherapeutics are designed to target rapidly dividing cells, the presence of a low-proliferating cell population contributes significantly to treatment resistance. Interestingly, recent studies have shown that compressive stresses acting on tumor spheroids are able to hinder cell proliferation, through a mechanism of growth inhibition. However, studies analyzing the influence of mechanical compression on therapeutic treatment efficacy have still to be performed. In this work, we start from an existing mathematical model for avascular tumors, including the description of mechanical compression. We introduce governing equations for transport and uptake of a chemotherapeutic agent, acting on cell proliferation. Then, model equations are adapted for tumor spheroids and the combined effect of compressive stresses and drug action is investigated. Interestingly, we find that the variation in tumor spheroid volume, due to the presence of a drug targeting cell proliferation, considerably depends on the compressive stress level of the cell aggregate. Our results suggest that mechanical compression of tumors may compromise the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents. In particular, a drug dose that is effective in reducing tumor volume for stress-free conditions may not perform equally well in a mechanically compressed environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.