Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28392162›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2017

Oncolytic Virotherapy: A Contest between Apples and Oranges.

Stephen J Russell, Kah-Whye Peng

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical Application of Oncolytic Viruses: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Bioactive materials · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen J RussellDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Electronic address: sjr@mayo.edu.
Kah-Whye PengDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Project 4: Targeting Resistance to T-Cell Directed Therapy in Multiple MyelomaP50CA186781 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Peter Leif Bergsagel · 2015 to 2026
$25.5M
Phase I trial of intravenous vesicular stomatitis virus for treatment of metastatic endometrial cancerR01CA207240 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BAKKUM-GAMEZ, JAMIE N, BLOCK, MATTHEW STEPHEN · 2017 to 2021
$2.5M
Intravenous Administration of Vesicular Stomatitis VectorsR01CA175795 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PENG, KAH-WHYE · 2014 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186781NCI NIH HHS R01 CA175795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viruses can be engineered or adapted for selective propagation in neoplastic tissues and further modified for therapeutic transgene expression to enhance their antitumor potency and druggability. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) can be administered locally or intravenously and spread to a variable degree at sites of tumor growth. OV-infected tumor cells die in situ, releasing viral and tumor antigens that are phagocytosed by macrophages, transported to regional lymph nodes, and presented to antigen-reactive T cells, which proliferate before dispersing to kill uninfected tumor cells at distant sites. Several OVs are showing clinical promise, and one of them, talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), was recently granted marketing approval for intratumoral therapy of nonresectable metastatic melanoma. T-VEC also appears to substantially enhance clinical responsiveness to checkpoint inhibitor antibody therapy. Here, we examine the T-VEC paradigm and review some of the approaches currently being pursued to develop the next generation of OVs for both local and systemic administration, as well as for use in combination with other immunomodulatory agents.

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationAntigens, NeoplasmGenetic VectorsHerpesvirus 1, HumanHumansLymph NodesMeasles virusMelanomaMultiple MyelomaMutant Chimeric ProteinsOncolytic VirotherapyOncolytic VirusesPlasmacytomaSkin NeoplasmsT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmMutant Chimeric Proteinscompetitive landscapeoncolytic virotherapyT-VECviro-immuno-oncology

Identifiers

PMID28392162
PMCPMC5417845
OpenAlexW2604405073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.