Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28392141›Full record

Observational studyVaccine2017

Clinician-parent discussions about influenza vaccination of children and their association with vaccine acceptance.

Annika M Hofstetter, Jeffrey D Robinson, Katherine Lepere, Morgan Cunningham, Nicole Etsekson, Douglas J Opel

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Vaccine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Trust, A Key to Counter Vaccine Hesitancy.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinician Communication to Address Vaccine Hesitancy.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annika M HofstetterDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: annika.hofstetter@seattlechildrens.org.
Jeffrey D RobinsonDepartment of Communication, Portland State University, Portland, OR, United States. Electronic address: jeffreyr@pdx.edu.
Katherine LepereSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: katherine.lepere@seattlechildrens.org.
Morgan CunninghamSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: cunnimor@ohsu.edu.
Nicole EtseksonSeattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: nicole.etsekson@seattlechildrens.org.
Douglas J OpelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: douglas.opel@seattlechildrens.org.

Funding

Increasing Child Immunization Rates via Improved Provider-Parent CommunicationK23HD069467 · NICHD · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI OPEL, DOUGLAS J · 2011 to 2015
$650k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD069467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine how clinicians communicate with parents about influenza vaccination and the effect of these communication behaviors on parental vaccine decision-making. STUDY

designWe performed a secondary analysis of data obtained from a cross-sectional observational study in which health supervision visits between pediatric clinicians and English-speaking parents of young children were videotaped. Eligible visits occurred during the 2011-2012 and 2013-2014 influenza seasons, included children ≥6months, and contained an influenza vaccine discussion. A coding scheme of 10 communication behaviors was developed and applied to each visit. Associations between clinician communication behaviors and parental verbal vaccine acceptance and parental visit experience were examined using bivariate analysis and generalized linear mixed models.

resultsFifty visits involving 17 clinicians from 8 practices were included in analysis. The proportion of parents who accepted influenza vaccine was higher when clinicians initiated influenza vaccine recommendations using presumptive rather than participatory formats (94% vs. 28%, p<0.001; adjusted odds ratio 48.2, 95% CI 3.5-670.5). Parental acceptance was also higher if clinicians pursued (vs. did not pursue) original recommendations when parents voiced initial resistance (80% vs. 13%, p<0.05) or made recommendations for influenza vaccine concurrent with (vs. separate from) recommendations for other vaccines due at the visit (83% vs. 33%, p<0.01). Parental visit experience did not differ significantly by clinician communication behaviors.

conclusionPresumptive initiation of influenza vaccine recommendations, pursuit in the face of resistance, and concurrent vaccine recommendations appear to increase parental acceptance of influenza vaccine without negatively affecting visit experience.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareProfessional-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleYoung AdultInfluenza VaccinesCommunicationInfantsInfluenza vaccinesNurse practitionersParentsPediatriciansVaccinationVaccination refusal

Identifiers

PMID28392141
PMCPMC5572763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.