Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28392127›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2017

NY-ESO-1 expression predicts an aggressive phenotype of ovarian cancer.

J Brian Szender, Antonios Papanicolau-Sengos, Kevin H Eng, Anthony J Miliotto, Amit A Lugade, Sacha Gnjatic, Junko Matsuzaki, Carl D Morrison, Kunle Odunsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Advances in immunotherapies in ovarian cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. NY-ESO-1 antigen: A promising frontier in cancer immunotherapy.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Brian SzenderDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States.
Antonios Papanicolau-SengosOmniseq LLC, Buffalo, NY 14203, United States.
Kevin H EngBiostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States.
Anthony J MiliottoCenter for Immunotherapy, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States.
Amit A LugadeCenter for Immunotherapy, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States.
Sacha GnjaticTisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, United States.
Junko MatsuzakiCenter for Immunotherapy, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States.
Carl D MorrisonOmniseq LLC, Buffalo, NY 14203, United States.
Kunle OdunsiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States; Center for Immunotherapy, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States. Electronic address: kunle.odunsi@roswellpark.org.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
RPCI-UPCI Ovarian Cancer SPOREP50CA159981 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MOYSICH, KIRSTEN B. · 2013 to 2025
$19.6M
Personalized Immunotherapy of Patients with Ovarian CancerP01CA190174 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SABBATINI, PAUL J · 2015 to 2019
$10.5M
Postdoctoral Research Training in Surgical OncologyT32CA108456 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI YENDAMURI, SAIKRISHNA · 2006 to 2020
$2.8M
mTOR inhibition for generating memory T cells to enhance ovarian tumor immunityR01CA158318 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ODUNSI, KUNLE, SHRIKANT, PROTUL · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Informatic Methods for Differential Signaling and Immune Co-Regulatory ExpressionK01LM012100 · NLM · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ENG, KEVIN HASEGAWA · 2015 to 2017
$502k
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA190174NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS P50 CA159981NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158318NCI NIH HHS T32 CA108456NLM NIH HHS K01 LM012100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNY-ESO-1 is a cancer testis antigen and a promising target for immunotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the expression frequency, immunogenicity, and clinical impact of NY-ESO-1 in ovarian cancer.

methodsImmunohistochemistry (IHC), reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and quantitative-PCR (qRT-PCR) were utilized in an ovarian cancer (including Fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers) patient cohort; humoral responses against NY-ESO-1 were determined by ELISA. Clinicopathologic outcomes including progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival were evaluated based on NY-ESO-1 expression. Cohen's kappa (κ) tested agreement between expression tests.

resultsNY-ESO-1 expression was detected by any method in 40.7% of 1002 patients' tumors (NY-ESO-1+) and baseline humoral response was identified in 19.0% of 689 tested patients. NY-ESO-1+ patients were older (p<0.001), higher stage (85% stage III/IV vs. 76.4%, p=0.015), less likely to have a complete response to initial therapy (53.9% vs. 68.9%, p=0.002), had more serous histotype (74.5% vs. 66.9%, p=0.011), and had more grade 3 tumors (83.7% vs. 70.8%, p<0.001). There was a trend towards shorter PFS (22.2 vs. 25.0months, p=0.07) and significantly shorter OS (42.9 vs. 50.0months, p=0.003) among NY-ESO-1+ patients. A subset analysis of NY-ESO-1+ patients that received immunotherapy demonstrated improved OS by >2years (52.6 vs. 27.2months, p<0.001).

conclusionsThis study is the first demonstration of an association between NY-ESO-1 expression and an aggressive cancer phenotype. The relatively high expression frequency of NY-ESO-1 in ovarian cancer patients coupled with the poor clinical outcomes in NY-ESO-1+ patients reveals an underappreciated need for targeted therapy against this antigen. In support, our study reveals that NY-ESO-1+ patients enrolled on immunotherapy trials targeting the antigen exhibited an improvement in OS.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunotherapyMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasm GradingOvarian NeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCTAG1B protein, humanMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28392127
PMCPMC5497581
OpenAlexW2605292535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.