Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28392112›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2017

A Descending Neuron Correlated with the Rapid Steering Maneuvers of Flying Drosophila.

Bettina Schnell, Ivo G Ros, Michael H Dickinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Synaptic architecture of leg and wing premotor control networks inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Descending control of motor sequences in Drosophila.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fine-grained descending control of steering in walkingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bettina SchnellDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, 24 Kincaid Hall, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Ivo G RosDivision of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
Michael H DickinsonDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, 24 Kincaid Hall, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Division of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. Electronic address: flyman@caltech.edu.

Funding

Integrative Functional Mapping of Sensory-Motor PathwaysU01NS090514 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DICKINSON, MICHAEL H, HOLMES, PHILIP J · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To navigate through the world, animals must stabilize their path against disturbances and change direction to avoid obstacles and to search for resources [1, 2]. Locomotion is thus guided by sensory cues but also depends on intrinsic processes, such as motivation and physiological state. Flies, for example, turn with the direction of large-field rotatory motion, an optomotor reflex that is thought to help them fly straight [3-5]. Occasionally, however, they execute fast turns, called body saccades, either spontaneously or in response to patterns of visual motion such as expansion [6-8]. These turns can be measured in tethered flying Drosophila [3, 4, 9], which facilitates the study of underlying neural mechanisms. Whereas there is evidence for an efference copy input to visual interneurons during saccades [10], the circuits that control spontaneous and visually elicited saccades are not well known. Using two-photon calcium imaging and electrophysiological recordings in tethered flying Drosophila, we have identified a descending neuron whose activity is correlated with both spontaneous and visually elicited turns during tethered flight. The cell's activity in open- and closed-loop experiments suggests that it does not underlie slower compensatory responses to horizontal motion but rather controls rapid changes in flight path. The activity of this neuron can explain some of the behavioral variability observed in response to visual motion and appears sufficient for eliciting turns when artificially activated. This work provides an entry point into studying the circuits underlying the control of rapid steering maneuvers in the fly brain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalCells, CulturedDrosophila melanogasterFlight, AnimalMotion PerceptionNervous System Physiological PhenomenaNeuronsVisual Perceptiondescending neuronDrosophilaflightsaccadesspontaneous behavior

Identifiers

PMID28392112
PMCPMC6309624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.