Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28391550›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autologous transplantation for osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rens Bexkens, Paul T Ogink, Job N Doornberg, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Denise Eygendaal, Luke S Oh, Michel P J van den Bekerom

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rens BexkensDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Medicine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 175 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. rensbexkens@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6993-0941
Paul T OginkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Medicine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 175 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Job N DoornbergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gino M M J KerkhoffsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Denise EygendaalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Luke S OhDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Medicine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 175 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Michel P J van den BekeromDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Oosterpark 9, 1091 AC,, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the rate of donor-site morbidity after osteochondral autologous transplantation (OATS) for capitellar osteochondritis dissecans.

methodsA literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library to identify studies up to November 6, 2016. Criteria for inclusion were OATS for capitellar osteochondritis dissecans, reported outcomes related to donor sites, ≥10 patients, ≥1 year follow-up, and written in English. Donor-site morbidity was defined as persistent symptoms (≥1 year) or cases that required subsequent intervention. Patient and harvest characteristics were described, as well as the rate of donor-site morbidity. A random effects model was used to calculate and compare weighted group proportions.

resultsEleven studies including 190 patients were included. In eight studies, grafts were harvested from the femoral condyle, in three studies, from either the 5th or 6th costal-osteochondral junction. The average number of grafts was 2 (1-5); graft diameter ranged from 2.6 to 11 mm. In the knee-to-elbow group, donor-site morbidity was reported in 10 of 128 patients (7.8%), knee pain during activity (7.0%) and locking sensations (0.8%). In the rib-to-elbow group, one of 62 cases (1.6%) was complicated, a pneumothorax. The proportion in the knee-to-elbow group was 0.04 (95% CI 0.0-0.15), and the proportion in the rib-to-elbow group was 0.01 (95% CI 0.00-0.06). There were no significant differences between both harvest techniques (n.s.).

conclusionsDonor-site morbidity after OATS for capitellar osteochondritis dissecans was reported in a considerable group of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies.

Indexed as

ArthralgiaBone TransplantationElbow JointFemurHumansKnee JointOsteochondritis DissecansPostoperative ComplicationsRibsTransplantation, AutologousTransplant Donor SiteCapitellumDonor-site morbidity.Graft harvestingKneeOsteochondral autologous transplantationOsteochondritis dissecans

Identifiers

PMID28391550
PMCPMC5489608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.