Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28391447›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2017

The comparability of HR-pQCT bone measurements is improved by scanning anatomically standardized regions.

S Bonaretti, S Majumdar, T F Lang, S Khosla, A J Burghardt

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Meta-analyses of the quantitative computed tomography data in dialysis patients show differential impacts of renal failure on the trabecular and cortical bones.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Associations of muscle strength and functional power with longitudinal change in HR-pQCT bone parameters: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patella fractures are associated with bone fragility - a retrospective study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bone Microarchitecture and Strength in Long-Standing Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  16. Reference data and calculators for second-generation HR-pQCT measures of the radius and tibia at anatomically standardized regions in White adults.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  17. Reference values and clinical predictors of bone strength for HR-pQCT-based distal radius and tibia strength assessments in women and men.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  18. Guidelines for the assessment of bone density and microarchitecture in vivo using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  19. Biological basis of bone strength: anatomy, physiology and measurement.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2020
    Review
  20. Associations between physical activity and bone structure in older adults: does the use of self-reported versus objective assessments of physical activity influence the relationship?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S BonarettiMusculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, QB3 Building, Suite 203, 1700 4th St, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
S MajumdarMusculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, QB3 Building, Suite 203, 1700 4th St, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
T F LangMusculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, QB3 Building, Suite 203, 1700 4th St, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
S KhoslaDivision of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
A J BurghardtMusculoskeletal Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, University of California, QB3 Building, Suite 203, 1700 4th St, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA. andrew.burghardt@ucsf.edu.

Funding

SEX STEROIDS, GROWTH FACTORS, &BONE CELL FUNCTIONP01AG004875 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MONROE, DAVID G · 1985 to 2019
$30.8M
EPIDEMIOLOGY OF AGE-RELATED BONE LOSS, &FRACTURESR01AR027065 · NIAMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AMIN, SHREYASEE, KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 1986 to 2020
$14.9M
Bone quality by vQCT and HR-pQCT: translation to multi-center clinical researchR01AR060700 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BURGHARDT, ANDREW JOHN, LANG, THOMAS F · 2011 to 2014
$2.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR027065NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR060700NIA NIH HHS P01 AG004875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the sensitivity of distal bone density, structure, and strength measurements by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to variability in limb length. Our results demonstrate that HR-pQCT should be performed at a standard %-of-total-limb-length to avoid substantial measurement bias in population study comparisons and the evaluation of individual skeletal status in a clinical context.

introductionHigh-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) measures of bone do not account for anatomic variability in bone length: a 1-cm volume is acquired at a fixed offset from an anatomic landmark. Our goal was to evaluate HR-pQCT measurement variability introduced by imaging fixed vs. proportional volumes and to propose a standard protocol for relative anatomic positioning.

methodsDouble-length (2-cm) scans were acquired in 30 adults. We compared measurements from 1-cm sub-volumes located at the default fixed offset, and the average %-of-length offset. The average position corresponded to 4.0% ± 1.1 mm for radius, and 7.2% ± 2.2 mm for tibia. We calculated the RMS difference in bone parameters and T-scores to determine the measurement variability related to differences in limb length. We used anthropometric ratios to estimate the mean limb length for published HR-pQCT reference data, and then calculated mean %-of-length offsets.

resultsVariability between fixed vs. relative scan positions was highest in the radius, and for cortical bone in general (RMS difference Ct.Th = 19.5%), while individuals had T-score differentials as high as +3.0 SD (radius Ct.BMD). We estimated that average scan position for published HR-pQCT reference data corresponded to 4.0% at the radius, and 7.3% at tibia.

conclusionVariability in limb length introduces significant bias to HR-pQCT measures, confounding cross-sectional analyses and limiting the clinical application for individual assessment of skeletal status. We propose to standardize scan positioning using 4.0 and 7.3% of total bone length for the distal radius and tibia, respectively.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnatomic LandmarksAnthropometryBone DensityFemaleFinite Element AnalysisForearmHumansLegMaleRadiusReproducibility of ResultsTibiaTomography, X-Ray ComputedBoneHR-pQCTMulticenter studyOsteoporosisPrecisionStandardization

Identifiers

PMID28391447
PMCPMC5526099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.