Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28391439›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2017

One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: First 407 Patients in 1 year.

Yonatan Lessing, Niv Pencovich, Marian Khatib, Shai Meron-Eldar, Joseph Koriansky, Subhi Abu-Abeid

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yonatan LessingDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. ylessing@gmail.com.
Niv PencovichDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Marian KhatibDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Shai Meron-EldarDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Joseph KorianskyDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Subhi Abu-AbeidDivision of General Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a promising laparoscopic procedure with various benefits including shorter operating times and less operative complications. That said, it is yet to gain widespread acceptance. Here, we describe our first-year experience with OAGB in our department, in particular the safety and efficacy of this procedure.

methodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent OAGB between March 2015 and March 2016 by our bariatric surgery unit. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative and postoperative data were collected and analyzed as well as outcomes during the first year.

resultsFour hundred and seven patients underwent OAGB (254 females, average age 41.8 ± 12.05, BMI = 41.7 ± 5.77 kg/m

conclusionsOAGB is both safe and effective as a primary as well as a revision bariatric surgery.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedComorbidityFemaleGastrectomyGastric BypassHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidOperative TimeReoperationRetrospective StudiesBariatricBMIMini-gastric bypassObesitySleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.