Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28391421›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2017

The Rising Incidence of Younger Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Questions About Screening, Biology, and Treatment.

Louise C Connell, José Mauricio Mota, Maria Ignez Braghiroli, Paulo M Hoff

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 239 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Understanding the Impact of Psychosocial Barriers on Colorectal Cancer Knowledge in Emerging Adult Black Men.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Colon Cancer and Pregnancy.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louise C ConnellCentro de Oncologia, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91-Bela Vista, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil.
José Mauricio MotaCentro de Oncologia, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91-Bela Vista, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil.
Maria Ignez BraghiroliCentro de Oncologia, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91-Bela Vista, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil. ignezbraghiroli@gmail.com.
Paulo M HoffCentro de Oncologia, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91-Bela Vista, São Paulo, SP, 01308-050, Brazil.
Hospital Sírio-Libanês · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cancer diagnosed globally and an important cause of cancer-related mortality. Of interest, while we have witnessed a declining incidence trend over the past few decades in the older population, incidence rates for adolescents and young adults have been increasing steadily. Several factors may well explain this apparent epidemic in the young, namely a lack of routine screening and emerging lifestyle issues such as obesity, lack of exercise, and dietary factors. It is known that both environmental and genetic factors can increase the likelihood of developing CRC. Although inherited susceptibility is associated with the most striking increases in risk, and must always be considered in a young patient with CRC, the majority of CRCs are in fact sporadic rather than familial. Early-onset CRC is a truly heterogeneous disease, with mounting evidence to suggest that this patient population has a distinctive molecular profile, very different to late-onset CRC cases. Currently, both younger and older patients with CRC are treated in essentially the same manner, but with a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying CRC in the young, we will have the opportunity to specifically tailor screening and clinical management strategies in this unique patient population in an effort to improve outcomes. The aim of this review is to outline our current knowledge of the distinguishing features of early-onset CRC, the ongoing research efforts, and the evolving evidence in this field.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsAge of OnsetColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDisease ManagementEarly Detection of CancerGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIncidencePopulation SurveillanceRisk FactorsYoung AdultChromosomal instabilityCpG island methylator phenotypeEarly-onset colorectal cancerEpidemiologyHereditary syndromesLynch syndromeMicrosatellite instabilityNonhereditary risk factorsScreeningSporadic early-onset colorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID28391421
OpenAlexW2605004662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.