Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28391241›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2017

A Variational Bayes Genomic-Enabled Prediction Model with Genotype × Environment Interaction.

Osval A Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, José Crossa, José Cricelio Montesinos-López, Francisco Javier Luna-Vázquez, Josafhat Salinas-Ruiz, José R Herrera-Morales, Raymundo Buenrostro-Mariscal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, 28040, México.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezDepartamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, 44430, Jalisco, México.
José CrossaBiometrics and Statistics Unit and Global Wheat Program of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), 06600 México D.F., México j.crossa@cgiar.org.
José Cricelio Montesinos-LópezDepartamento de Estadística, Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas (CIMAT), 36240 Guanajuato, México.
Francisco Javier Luna-VázquezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, 28040, México.
Josafhat Salinas-RuizColegio de Postgraduados, Campus Córdoba, Km. 348 Carretera Federal Córdoba-Veracruz, Amatlán de los Reyes, 94946, México.
José R Herrera-MoralesFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, 28040, México.
Raymundo Buenrostro-MariscalFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, 28040, México.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are Bayesian and non-Bayesian genomic models that take into account G×E interactions. However, the computational cost of implementing Bayesian models is high, and becomes almost impossible when the number of genotypes, environments, and traits is very large, while, in non-Bayesian models, there are often important and unsolved convergence problems. The variational Bayes method is popular in machine learning, and, by approximating the probability distributions through optimization, it tends to be faster than Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. For this reason, in this paper, we propose a new genomic variational Bayes version of the Bayesian genomic model with G×E using half-t priors on each standard deviation (SD) term to guarantee highly noninformative and posterior inferences that are not sensitive to the choice of hyper-parameters. We show the complete theoretical derivation of the full conditional and the variational posterior distributions, and their implementations. We used eight experimental genomic maize and wheat data sets to illustrate the new proposed variational Bayes approximation, and compared its predictions and implementation time with a standard Bayesian genomic model with G×E. Results indicated that prediction accuracies are slightly higher in the standard Bayesian model with G×E than in its variational counterpart, but, in terms of computation time, the variational Bayes genomic model with G×E is, in general, 10 times faster than the conventional Bayesian genomic model with G×E. For this reason, the proposed model may be a useful tool for researchers who need to predict and select genotypes in several environments.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremGene-Environment InteractionGenotypeModels, GeneticAlgorithmsBiological EvolutionGenomicsModels, StatisticalReproducibility of ResultsSelection, GeneticTriticumZea maysgenome-enabled predictionGenomic SelectionGenPredmulti-environmentShared Data Resourcesvariational Bayes

Identifiers

PMID28391241
PMCPMC5473762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.