ReviewDrug discovery today2017
Cancer-on-a-chip systems at the frontier of nanomedicine.
Review in Drug discovery today, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virus-like particles in cancer immunotherapy: bridging human and veterinary medicine through one health.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Review
- Microfluidic Platform for Predicting Nanoparticle Dynamics in Cancer Therapeutics.Journal of fluorescence · 2025Article
- Recent advances in applications of nanoparticles and decellularized ECM for organoid engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Constructing biomimetic microenvironments for liver regeneration.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Targeted Cancer Therapy-on-A-Chip.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Tumor-microenvironment-on-a-chip: the construction and application.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
- Magnetic nanosystem a tool for targeted delivery and diagnostic application: Current challenges and recent advancement.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2024Review
- Article
- Mimicking angiogenic microenvironment of alveolar soft-part sarcoma in a microfluidic coculture vasculature chip.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Aluminum enhances the oxidative damage of ZnO NMs in the human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cell line.Discover nano · 2024Article
- The progressive trend of modeling and drug screening systems of breast cancer bone metastasis.Journal of biological engineering · 2024Review
- Emerging trends in organ-on-a-chip systems for drug screening.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2023Review
- Recent advances in lab-on-a-chip systems for breast cancer metastasis research.Nanoscale advances · 2023Review
- Primary Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells Cultivation in Microfluidic Hydrogel Microcapsules for Drug Evaluation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Application of microfluidic chips in the simulation of the urinary system microenvironment.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Engineering Hydrogels for Modulation of Dendritic Cell Function.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Three-dimensional (3D) liver cell models - a tool for bridging the gap between animal studies and clinical trials when screening liver accumulation and toxicity of nanobiomaterials.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Review
- Engineered Microphysiological Systems for Testing Effectiveness of Cell-Based Cancer Immunotherapies.Cancers · 2022Review
- Tumor-on-a-chip model for advancement of anti-cancer nano drug delivery system.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanomedicine provides a unique opportunity for promoting drug efficacy through enhanced delivery mechanisms. However, its translation into the clinics has been relatively slow compared with the large amount of research occurring in laboratory settings. Given the limitations of conventional cell culture models and preclinical animal models, we discuss the potential utility of recently developed cancer-on-a-chip platforms, which maximally replicate the pathophysiology of the human tumor microenvironments, as alternatives for effective evaluation of nanomedicine. We begin with a brief discussion of nanomedicine, then chart the history of organ-on-a-chip platform development and their recent evolution as tools for modeling different cancers for assessing nanomedicine efficacy, concluding with future perspectives for the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.