Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28390695›Full record

SynthesisLancet (London, England)2017

Achieved blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: results from ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials.

Michael Böhm, Helmut Schumacher, Koon K Teo, Eva M Lonn, Felix Mahfoud, Johannes F E Mann, Giuseppe Mancia, Josep Redon, Roland E Schmieder, Karen Sliwa and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lancet (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
26.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 309 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-linear associations between blood pressure and clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2019).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Blood pressure during long-term cilostazol-based dual antiplatelet therapy after stroke: a post hoc analysis of the CSPS.com trial.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Beyond the guidelines: Vascular function as the central determinant and therapeutic target in hypertension.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Michael BöhmKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany. Electronic address: michael.boehm@uks.eu.
Helmut SchumacherIngelheim, Germany.
Koon K TeoPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Eva M LonnPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Felix MahfoudKlinik für Innere Medizin III, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.
Johannes F E MannKfH Kidney Center, Munich and Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Giuseppe ManciaUniversity of Milano-Bicocca, Istituto Clinico Universitario Policlinico di Monza, Milan, Italy.
Josep RedonHypertension Unit, Hospital CIínico Universitario, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Roland E SchmiederDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Karen SliwaHatter Institute for Cardiovascular Research in Africa and IIDMM, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Michael A WeberState University of New York, Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Bryan WilliamsUniversity College London (UCL) Institute of Cardiovascular Science and National Institute for Health Research UCL Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK.
Salim YusufPopulation Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEMcMaster University · CASaarland University · DENational Institute for Health Research · GBPopulation Health Research Institute · CASUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USUniversitat de València · ESUniversity of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13090
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies have challenged the appropriateness of accepted blood pressure targets. We hypothesised that different levels of low blood pressure are associated with benefit for some, but harm for other outcomes.

methodsIn this analysis, we assessed the previously reported outcome data from high-risk patients aged 55 years or older with a history of cardiovascular disease, 70% of whom had hypertension, from the ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials investigating ramipril, telmisartan, and their combination, with a median follow-up of 56 months. Detailed descriptions of randomisation and intervention have already been reported. We analysed the associations between mean blood pressure achieved on treatment; prerandomisation baseline blood pressure; or time-updated blood pressure (last on treatment value before an event) on the composite outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospital admission for heart failure; the components of the composite outcome; and all-cause death. Analysis was done by Cox regression analysis, ANOVA, and χ

findingsRecruitment for ONTARGET took place between Dec 1, 2001, and July 31, 2008. TRANSCEND took place between Nov 1, 2001, and May 30, 2004. 30 937 patients were recruited from 733 centres in 40 countries and followed up for a median of 56 months. In ONTARGET, 25 127 patients known to be tolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors were randomly assigned after a run-in period to oral ramipril 10 mg/day (n=8407), telmisartan 80 mg/day (n=8386), or the combination of both (n=8334). In TRANSCEND, 5810 patients who were intolerant to ACE-inhibitors were randomly assigned to oral telmisartan 80 mg/day (n=2903) or placebo (n=2907). Baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) 140 mm Hg or higher was associated with greater incidence of all outcomes compared with 120 mm Hg to less than 140 mm Hg. By contrast, a baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) less than 70 mm Hg was associated with the highest risk for most outcomes compared with all DBP categories 70 mm Hg or more. In 4052 patients with SBP less than 120 mm Hg on treatment, the risk of the composite cardiovascular outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1·14, 95% CI 1·03-1·26), cardiovascular death (1·29, 1·12-1·49), and all deaths (1·28, 1·15-1·42) were increased compared with those in whom SBP was 120-140 mm Hg during treatment (HR 1 for all outcomes, n=16099). No harm or benefit was observed for myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospital admission for heart failure. Mean achieved SBP more accurately predicted outcomes than baseline or time-updated SBP, and was associated with the lowest risk at approximately 130 mm Hg, and at 110-120 mm Hg risk increased for the combined outcome, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death except stroke. A mean DBP less than 70 mm Hg (n=5352) during treatment was associated with greater risk of the composite primary outcome (HR 1·31, 95% CI 1·20-1·42), myocardial infarction (1·55, 1·33-1·80), hospital admission for heart failure (1·59, 1·36-1·86) and all-cause death (1·16, 1·06-1·28) than a DBP 70-80 mm Hg (14 305). A pretreatment and mean on-treatment DBP of about 75 mm Hg was associated with the lowest risk.

interpretationMean achieved SBP less than 120 mm Hg during treatment was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular outcomes except for myocardial infarction and stroke. Similar patterns were observed for DBP less than 70 mm Hg, plus increased risk for myocardial infarction and hospital admission for heart failure. Very low blood pressure achieved on treatment was associated with increased risks of several cardiovascular disease events. These data suggest that the lowest blood pressure possible is not necessarily the optimal target for high-risk patients, although it is not possible to rule out some effect of reverse causality.

fundingBoehringer Ingelheim.

Indexed as

AgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBenzoatesBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansHypertensionHypotensionMaleMiddle AgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsBenzimidazolesBenzoatesRamiprilTelmisartan

Identifiers

PMID28390695
OpenAlexW2604571987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.