Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28390525›Full record

ReviewMagnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America2017

Principles of Simultaneous PET/MR Imaging.

Ciprian Catana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Hybrid [AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Reduction of [EJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Somatostatin Receptor-PET/CT/MRI of Head and Neck Neuroendocrine Tumors.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. CerebralObesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Scan-rescan measurement repeatability ofJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ciprian CatanaAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Building 149, 13th Street, Room 2.301, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA. Electronic address: ccatana@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

MR-assisted PET data optimization for neuroimaging studiesR01EB014894 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CATANA, CIPRIAN · 2013 to 2016
$2.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combined PET/MR imaging scanners capable of acquiring simultaneously the complementary information provided by the 2 imaging modalities are now available for human use. After addressing the hardware challenges for integrating the 2 imaging modalities, most of the efforts in the field have focused on developing MR-based attenuation correction methods for neurologic and whole-body applications, implementing approaches for improving one modality by using the data provided by the other and exploring research and clinical applications that could benefit from the synergistic use of the multimodal data.

Indexed as

HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyIntegrated hardwareMR-Based attenuation correctionMR imagingMultimodal imagingPETPET/MR imagingSimultaneous imagingTime-of-flight PET

Identifiers

PMID28390525
PMCPMC5385858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.