Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28390503›Full record

Trial reportBehavior therapy2017

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Computerized Interactive Media-Based Problem Solving Treatment for Depression.

Luis R Sandoval, Jay C Buckey, Ricardo Ainslie, Martin Tombari, William Stone, Mark T Hegel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavior therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02726061 (Internet Based Psychological Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02726061 narecruitingnot on this map

Internet Based Psychological Support

TypeinterventionalSponsorDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterRan2016 to 2031Enrolled500ConditionsDepression, Stress, Conflict ResolutionArmsInternet-based psychological support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Luis R SandovalBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School. Electronic address: lsandova@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Jay C BuckeyDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.
Ricardo AinslieUniversity of Texas.
Martin TombariUniversity of Texas.
William StoneBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School.
Mark T HegelDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center.
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USHadassah Medical Center · IL

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (UL1)UL1TR000170 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2012 to 2013
$31.4M
Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000170NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of an interactive media-based, computer-delivered depression treatment program (imbPST) compared to a no-treatment control condition (NTC) in a parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial conducted in an outpatient psychiatric research clinic. 45 adult participants with major depressive disorder or dysthymia were randomized to receive either 6 weekly sessions of imbPST or no treatment (No Treatment Control; NTC). The primary outcome measure was the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). There was a significant Group x Time interaction effect [F (1.73, 43)= 58.78; p<.001; η2=.58, Cohens d=1.94], such that the patients receiving imbPST had a significantly greater reduction in depressive symptoms compared to the patients in the NTC condition. Participants in the imbPST group improved their depression symptoms significantly from moderate (BDI-II=21.9±4.20) to mild levels of depression (BDI-II=17.9±4.0) after receiving 3 weekly sessions of imbPST (p<0.001), and progressed to still milder levels of depression after six weekly sessions (BDI-II=14.5±3.7, p<0.001). NTC participants showed no significant reduction in BDI-II scores (BDI-II=21.8±4.2 pre, BDI-II=21.5±5.2 post, N.S.). Additionally, 40% of the imbPST group showed a clinically significant and reliable change in depression levels while none of the NTC group met this criterion. imbPST participants rated the program highly usable on the system usability scale (SUS) after the first session (SUS Session 1=74.6±7.2) and usability scores increased significantly by the last session (SUS Session 6=85.4±5.6). We conclude that imbPST is an effective, engaging, and easily used depression treatment program that warrants further evaluation with heterogeneous depressed populations in a stand-alone, self-administered fashion.

Indexed as

Problem SolvingAdultBehavior TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesTherapy, Computer-AssistedTreatment Outcomecomputer-based therapydepressionproblem solving therapyrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID28390503
PMCPMC5889085
OpenAlexW2346080612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.