Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28390420›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2017

Partnering with patients in translational oncology research: ethical approach.

Marie-France Mamzer, Nathalie Duchange, Sylviane Darquy, Patrice Marvanne, Claude Rambaud, Giovanna Marsico, Catherine Cerisey, Florian Scotté, Anita Burgun, Cécile Badoual and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marie-France MamzerLaboratoire d'Ethique Médicale et Médecine Légale EA4569, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France. marie-france.mamzer@parisdescartes.fr.
Nathalie DuchangeLaboratoire d'Ethique Médicale et Médecine Légale EA4569, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France.
Sylviane DarquyLaboratoire d'Ethique Médicale et Médecine Légale EA4569, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France.
Patrice MarvanneIndependent patient representative, Paris, France.
Claude RambaudCollectif Interassociatif Sur la Santé (CISS), 75007, Paris, France.
Giovanna MarsicoCancercontribution.fr, Paris, France.
Catherine CeriseyPatients & Web, Paris, France.
Florian ScottéLaboratoire d'Ethique Médicale et Médecine Légale EA4569, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France.
Anita BurgunDépartement d'informatique médicale, de biostatistique et de santé publique, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75015, Paris, France.
Cécile BadoualCentre de Ressources biologiques, Service d'anatomo-pathologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75015, Paris, France.
Pierre Laurent-PuigInserm UMR-S 1147, Université Paris Descartes, 75006, Paris, France.
Christian HervéLaboratoire d'Ethique Médicale et Médecine Légale EA4569, Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75006, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe research program CARPEM (cancer research and personalized medicine) brings together the expertise of researchers and hospital-based oncologists to develop translational research in the context of personalized or "precision" medicine for cancer. There is recognition that patient involvement can help to take into account their needs and priorities in the development of this emerging practice but there is currently no consensus about how this can be achieved. In this study, we developed an empirical ethical research action aiming to improve patient representatives' involvement in the development of the translational research program together with health professionals. The aim is to promote common understanding and sharing of knowledge between all parties and to establish a long-term partnership integrating patient's expectations.

methodsTwo distinct committees were settled in CARPEM: an "Expert Committee", gathering healthcare and research professionals, and a "Patient Committee", gathering patients and patient representatives. A multidisciplinary team trained in medical ethics research ensured communication between the two committees as well as analysis of discussions, minutes and outputs from all stakeholders.

resultsThe results highlight the efficiency of the transfer of knowledge between interested parties. Patient representatives and professionals were able to identify new ethical challenges and co-elaborate new procedures to gather information and consent forms for adapting to practices and recommendations developed during the process. Moreover, included patient representatives became full partners and participated in the transfer of knowledge to the public via conferences and publications.

conclusionsEmpirical ethical research based on a patient-centered approach could help in establishing a fair model for coordination and support actions during cancer research, striking a balance between the regulatory framework, researcher needs and patient expectations. Our approach addresses the concept of translational ethics as a way to handle the main remaining gap between combining care and research activities in the medical pathway and the existing framework.

Indexed as

CommunicationConsent FormsEthics CommitteesGuidelines as TopicHumansKnowledge BasesMedical OncologyMutationNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineTranslational Research, BiomedicalMedical ethicsPatient-centered approachPersonalized medicineTranslational ethicsTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID28390420
PMCPMC5385033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.